Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The Joy of *small* business Date: 22 Dec 2024 20:54:52 GMT Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <1248675b-e38a-04a7-93b3-6fa527725858@example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net CCS+D5gGz1obuxFE6P4vTAbFT3eNebsb9BfHPhOVylsQpT+ToT Cancel-Lock: sha1:3qNtbkY97F2bxIO+GViy9nPrbPo= sha256:xdfVWUzzdjZWVcdh3O7L0f6FPLTSih48zl7aH0ekfzo= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:62916 On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 09:53:14 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > One posits a supernatural 'Big Bang' from which time, space energy and > the laws of nature miraculously sprang, and the other posits a big > Creation from which time, space energy and the laws of nature > miraculously sprang, just already formed as a complete *fake*, like > someone today constructing a '1000 year old' house. Complete with faked > history. > > The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence > with a Plan in charge. The Big Bang theory came from a Jesuit priest. I don't believe it came from theology instead of Hubbell's observations. Einstein based his theories on a steady state universe and threw in a fudge factor to make the math come out right. Thus he believed. At the time the Jesuit won even though Einstein told him his physics sucked.