Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Date: 12 Dec 2024 20:22:17 GMT Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <947j2lx3qf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net> <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> <9639150c-d17c-bb50-a5f4-20ff82e00513@example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net wndVURi3V/nvdksddGKVmAK30qysWOzdKCWQVrbo0g98qhYUbQ Cancel-Lock: sha1:/mnVsgY24u6IczG3BMXYUKxjS3s= sha256:K+CEKVq0qa5D72aitkmcSIwhJ9BbK29lxn+pdEtqNt4= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:62264 On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:51:47 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Which is why the tendency today is to stick to around 3-4GHz clocks but > add more cores and local cache RAM , and security risk style predictive > branches. That gets a little spooky. When I was doing Z80 stuff at 4 to 6 MHz you could get away with a lot.