Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Date: 27 Nov 2024 19:12:28 GMT Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <1b166410-ecc1-f9e5-7218-cde9618f4686@example.net> <77840736-c143-e896-5da0-d0afae4915ed@example.net> <2118139f-4451-560b-5094-a3d61c05f0d3@example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net WD985ymCezyef4pewZE3Bw9ji4uFCxEwg8jY3HrjZI38/R4MdS Cancel-Lock: sha1:yIVQYFwqylYiXXVorePi2kAfD+Q= sha256:xRPB+w0NqihckVb+d/0g5sU4SoSwTejapqxPMGoc4f0= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:61419 On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:58:35 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > I've encountered that in my time in mil spec aerospace. > A very few people analysed the project and broke it down in to circuit > board specs. I worked on one DoD project in my career. I got bored and wandered off after 6 months of wrangling about the spec. About a year later I talked to one of the programmers who had stayed and asked if they'd written any code yet. "Nope." So much blood, sweat, tears, and ego involvement is involved in specs like that it will be implemented even if it becomes apparent it isn't going to work. Fiascos like the F-35 don't surprise me at all.