Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.politics,alt.economy,alt.business,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Nvidia Replaces Intel on DOW
Date: 3 Nov 2024 23:10:33 GMT
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <loqe79F9ob6U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <tBydna_kEexwnLr6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com> <vg7ddi$9l7r$1@dont-email.me> <-zmdnTyXmLloRrr6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net sOxskOGuqt81ai1ODAj2Pw0T9pBRXjzoGiAu+pO2V2ARDIKgNP
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F4JhE7nMMwW65CCL71w/uQ79utc= sha256:wg+K4aNevbM6odo8AHHtkdAmd4z9CwUqyiYtyqXNyGY=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:60452 alt.business:10431 talk.politics.misc:1165222

On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:24:19 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

>    They're trying, but Intel has very well refined solutions in that
>    market. ARM may ruin itself trying to catch up and they still won't
>    have that Intel brand-rec. IMHO ARM should continue to focus on
>    'devices', seeking the best mix of performance and low power
>    consumption.

<quibble>
I doubt Arm Holdings will ruin itself. Its licensees, otoh, may well do 
so. 
</quibble>