Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Date: 26 Oct 2024 05:45:31 GMT Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <_OmcnZpYmdE-PYX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <20241025153958.0000222f@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net lRbLv4oLiODtmRHvDGWhlAhIiXItfAS9iWAe6CxxVD11fUZSw+ Cancel-Lock: sha1:LWCANJVsRwwUV1YYdBdu44P+Q7k= sha256:DcetKMx16i0UTNhiEPfJ843nzC1zJndtUJnOypaK7cc= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:675217 comp.os.linux.misc:60053 On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 02:37:52 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 01:08:05 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> Welcome to the problems of metaphysics > > Next stop: that wonderful fallacy known as “you can’t prove a negative” > ... About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.