Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #59109
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: The joy of FORTRAN |
| Date | 2024-10-04 22:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lmb9k2F64inU8@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <vdnvk0$49ai$2@dont-email.me> <o8icnRRnt4ChGGL7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vdo3j6$4q92$1@dont-email.me> <lm9kg6Ft2vgU2@mid.individual.net> <vdpi96$bgk6$7@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 20:13:27 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > A lot of what we do in programming/scripting is building one layer of > “abstract machine” on top of another, until we get to something > optimized for solving our particular problem. True, but many people using a high level abstraction like Python think of it as some sort of magic without realizing it's some poor old turtle slaving away one opcode at a time. (Okay, so it's a team of turtles these days). My FORTRAN IV course started with an examination of the System 360 architecture before getting to the first FORTRAN statement. I'm not sure that happens anymore. Some of the people I worked with who were in their 40s or 50s had a course using the 68HC11 microcontroller at UM but that was later dropped from the curriculum in favor of abstraction. The last I knew Java was the didactic language of choice for the CS people there.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: The joy of FORTRAN "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-04 01:19 -0400
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-04 05:48 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-04 02:03 -0400
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-04 06:56 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-04 07:40 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-04 20:13 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-04 22:47 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-05 23:20 -0400
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-06 03:29 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Louis Krupp <lkrupp@invalid.pssw.com.invalid> - 2024-10-06 16:06 -0600
Re: The joy of FORTRAN rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-07 03:02 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-07 10:00 +0100
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-05 02:37 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-05 06:13 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-05 07:00 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-05 08:08 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-06 02:29 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-06 03:43 +0000
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-04 08:39 +0100
Re: The joy of FORTRAN John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-10-04 08:00 -0700
Re: The joy of FORTRAN Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-04 17:06 +0000
Re: python abstractions, The joy of FORTRAN John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2024-10-04 18:00 +0000
csiph-web