Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Crowdstrike fiasco
Date: 20 Jul 2024 18:42:21 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <lg2eodF2nlrU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <v7dbfl$2u3ri$1@dont-email.me> <14650d94-4742-6c3f-9c73-33e7468106c5@example.net> <v7gevu$p388$1@matrix.hispagatos.org> <v7gn63$3jnfn$2@dont-email.me> <AABmm+KJfkcAABMh.A3.flnews@ferrat.uplawski.eu> <3HSmO.57759$xYQc.40648@fx12.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net e7OsbJrQXo5Ub6/povPWGQXfnmz+U6pPocHzmK+2c4gi6lcYFe
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9kSEctOU5iuJ9Z2QaA8+FC2+KCs= sha256:CuR0CzhoTuoyBdzZcWbRzRIJIwS32XsUrikXf3icdjk=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:57068

On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 17:43:27 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> That explains the definition of "Quality Control" that I once heard:
> keeping quality under control so it doesn't rise too high and increase
> costs.

Stated honestly a large part of my college statistics course involved 
determining how many widgets you need to test to insure only N% of the 
output is defective, where N is determined by the cost of repairing/
replacing the defective widgets balanced against the QA costs.