Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Is It Time To Replace SSH ??? Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 23:35:23 +0100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <87r0x0xmre.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <87mt7mwyvl.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <871qoywh67.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <875ye9v7ho.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Yt/q09sbJl0/dohEfTrWOQjKSBE0OwM8DWeX7aIIUphqdJngRb Cancel-Lock: sha1:fBijDIvajTY3J8GkxW8rwdbiM1A= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: <875ye9v7ho.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:36542 On 18/12/2022 02.13, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: > On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 12:43:12 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> >> On 17/12/2022 09.47, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: >>> On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:03:27 -0500, David W. Hodgins wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't think so. Unless being DDoSed. But then you have to take a >>>>> completely different approach to mitigate the traffic. >>>> >>>> I don't block, but I use a non-standard port. Otherwise failed attempts >>>> can fill the filesystem where the logs are stored. I had that happen before >>>> I switched ports. >>> There's logrotate to take care of logfile sizes. >> >> That's not the issue. >> >> The issue is so much noise that something important will be missed. > > I was referring to "can fill the filesystem". Yes, rotating logs takes care of that. But the issue of too much noise remains. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R.