Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Niklas Karlsson Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: COBOL and tricks Date: 31 Jul 2022 13:38:47 GMT Organization: Department of Redundancy Department Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <1034215367.679945065.348792.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <2074045549.679949818.212355.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <2aadnYfne4Fc9Er_nZ2dnUU7-WnNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1993356671.680307216.022066.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <574555364.680474584.174865.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <20220726222648.bd05b68c16b046eb091b4e5c@eircom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net b3h9UFHtmRsfwGiipyIqawRquKHPm82QQ0NSjzcK70qGN74qPH Cancel-Lock: sha1:cIJW9tEE9q5zRKkM8cxy5IHEHRg= User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:221546 comp.os.linux.misc:35315 On 2022-07-26, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 21:52:32 +0100 > Vir Campestris wrote: > >> On 25/07/2022 21:55, Peter Flass wrote: >> > No, COBOL is for the NEXT poor bastard who has to look at your code and >> > try to figure out what the heck you were trying to do. The more >> > “concise” a language is, the more write-only it tends to be. >> >> Ah, you've seen APL then? > > The most unreadable language yet has to be whitespace: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language) Personally I favour ETA (no, not the JVM-based one). http://www.miketaylor.org.uk/tech/eta/doc/manual.html#7.2 Niklas -- Just because you *can* write a Java Virtual Machine in INTERCAL, that doesn't mean you *should*. -- David Cameron Staples makes the Understatement of the Year in asr