Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: goarilla Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4ucA/L+kOV9wr+0Q03Q+Vg"; logging-data="23974"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ggKrAOHy/x0Ac6dTepnV59D0fZlS0GrU=" User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yFOS9yDf8Q+Ng+FZNq1NsX4sEhY= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.misc:965 On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:10:24 -0400, despen wrote: > goarilla > writes: > >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:08:35 -0400, despen wrote: >> >>> despen@verizon.net writes: >>> Follow up. >>> >>> Progress is calculated off file size. >>> >>> An approach that is sure to fail. >> >> out of curiousity how would you design an accurate progress meter ? > > To start with, see next sentence: > >>> They should never let the number hit 100%, perhaps a message, "still >>> running, taking longer than expected..." > > Accurate would require that the program doing the conversion output > percentage numbers as it runs. Only that program would know where it is > in the input file. > > You can't really infer much from the size of the output file. yeah but a lot of times these programs are frontends for ffmpeg, mencoder, vobcopy, lame, ...