Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix5.panix.com!qz!not-for-mail From: Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Recent history of vi (was: Re: Python/C/Pascal ... How To Choose?) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2025 23:14:09 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Some absurd concept Message-ID: References: <10faucd$3p4r1$7@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2025 23:14:09 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix5.panix.com:166.84.1.5"; logging-data="21675"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: Vectrex rn 2.1 (beta) X-Liz: It's actually happened, the entire Internet is a massive game of Redcode X-Motto: "Erosion of rights never seems to reverse itself." -- kenny@panix X-US-Congress: Moronic Fucks. X-Attribution: EtB XFrom: is a real address Encrypted: double rot-13 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:77598 alt.folklore.computers:232174 In comp.os.linux.misc, Lawrence DOliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 22:07:46 -0000 (UTC), Eli the Bearded wrote: >> I also don't think it supports "arbitrary ex mode command in >> third column of a tags file" ... > Isn't there a vi derivative that supports Lua as an alternative extension > language to those antiquated ex commands? I wouldn't know and I don't care to look. I don't find scripting language integration with the editor to my tastes. I did just see someone in comp.editors complaining about something Lua related in vim, and I could believe vim offers it as a compile option. I have not compile vim myself in a while. (There was a 8.1.x vim that had a bug with on the : line, and that was painful enough for me to recompile instead of using the package, but since then package version is fine.) Elijah ------ whose notes say that compile was early 2020