Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: F2FS On USB Sticks? Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 14:07:58 +0100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <-02dnTLnIvSN6kP6nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net h5bF84QTGCIhIOuvizHvJQSEKtlbBhOyZEINyMdG+zQTDEdJVZ X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:4A7QIEz9xjT2TCeL6NSHvTRpxnI= sha256:GVrH+EeNB3lfWdQ6k69kOjX8fFCKZN/s071RzcVsQg8= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:66525 On 2025-03-22 11:21, Marc Haber wrote: > c186282 wrote: >> At present, every Linux I've used, the UEFI stuff is >> ALWAYS in a FAT partition. However it's SMALL, not >> a prob. It uses FAT because that is in the UEFI specs. The firmware reads that FAT, you do not want to support all the filesystems in the universe, and make the firmware huge and add more bugs. > Since you can put live and rescue images in the UEFI partition, I > usually make it 2 Gig or so. That's not SMALL. That's interesting. Do you have a link on info on that? > >> Don't love UEFI at all > > You should! It's neat. Yep. -- Cheers, Carlos.