Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 21:49:12 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: <495550f7-796e-4414-67ae-26d3f8ba16f1@example.net> <33442f75-5afe-ce6b-d5b2-19efc78a72d3@example.net> <2c1fb128-258b-7848-e896-3246674d460f@example.net> <2d814efc-b5f8-a1f9-d273-77016cb3cbae@example.net> <9cGcnY0c8c3LA8_6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <84211166-08c2-fd90-bfea-c1203f1d09db@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1450570581-1733690954=:3169" Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1922583"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:61977 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1450570581-1733690954=:3169 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sun, 8 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 08/12/2024 05:31, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> On 12/7/24 6:59 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 06/12/2024 17:12, D wrote: >>>> If you postulate something which can never be known, it is kind of >>>> useless. It goes the same way as god, or a postulated first mover etc. >>> >>> And yet that is what people do all the time. In fact it is the necessary >>> foundation of thinking. >>> >>> All metaphysics - and we all use it, whether we understand that we do or >>> not -  is to assume the framework for our understanding, and use it not >>> because it is demonstrably true, but because it *works* for us. >>> >>> We don't  and can't *know* that time and space exist - at least in the way >>> we understand them, but they do *work* for us, the way we understand them. >> >>   Careful ... the "luminiferous aether" WORKED - at least >>   with the existing physics  :-) >> > Exactly. That was Karl Poppers point. We don't discover the laws, we > actually make them up, and if they work, we use them. If you are interested, Bas van Fraassen probably has some interesting things to add as well. There was also a german guy who wrote something interesting in the 1920s I think on that theme, but for the moment the name does not come back to me. Ahh, here we go! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Philosophy_of_%27As_if%27 . > Mickelson-Morley rather gave the lie to a physically meaningful aether, so it > was dropped. > > # > >>   I suspect 'dark matter' will occupy a similar position. >> > :-) Probably > > --8323328-1450570581-1733690954=:3169--