Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Crowdstrike fiasco
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:44:01 +0200
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a6bfac51-3c8b-6c93-ce3a-d71ee928703d@example.net>
References: <v7dbfl$2u3ri$1@dont-email.me> <14650d94-4742-6c3f-9c73-33e7468106c5@example.net> <v7gevu$p388$1@matrix.hispagatos.org> <v7gn63$3jnfn$2@dont-email.me> <AABmm+KJfkcAABMh.A3.flnews@ferrat.uplawski.eu> <v7gotu$3jnfn$3@dont-email.me> <v7iccp$8d7$2@dont-email.me> <v7ihbl$vef$4@dont-email.me> <v7jvj7$8pms$7@dont-email.me> <v7l7ft$in60$5@dont-email.me> <v7mtrn$se4i$10@dont-email.me> <lg9gaqF569mU1@mid.individual.net> <v7o4ms$16db9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1321599910-1721745842=:3881"
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="94421"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v7o4ms$16db9$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:57159

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323328-1321599910-1721745842=:3881
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT



On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 23/07/2024 11:52, Andy Burns wrote:
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> 
>>> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You may recall the Government and big businesses supported X networking
>>>> propcols. X400. X 25.
>>> 
>>> No, I don’t recall any Government “supporting” those. 
>> 
>> 25 years ago the NHS used X.400 based email addresses
>
> "By 1984, the international reference model OSI model, which was not 
> compatible with TCP/IP, had been agreed upon. Many European governments 
> (particularly France, West Germany and the UK) and the United States 
> Department of Commerce mandated compliance with the OSI model, while the US 
> Department of Defense planned to transition from TCP/IP to OSI. "
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_Wars
>
> Once again Lawrence is simply wrong.

Yawn, that's getting tedious. Maybe we should make that the default, and 
exlaim when he is right instead? That would be much more interesting. ;)
--8323328-1321599910-1721745842=:3881--