Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:52:25 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a530f8e4-ee49-d352-1660-e6deaafb9b91@example.net>
References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me> <CaidP.24348$DPp5.20979@fx01.iad> <3002e7b9-095e-c292-1202-b151f7776587@example.net> <ltmbcmFjcgpU1@mid.individual.net> <ba6263f8-1e7f-5eb1-ae06-757f2ed7a018@example.net> <lto9qbFso18U3@mid.individual.net> <slrnvnegk1.2cl6d.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <8b262a1f-507f-ef10-e4d3-a981dca5b7d1@example.net> <vl8jdq$3st6d$1@dont-email.me> <vl8jul$3sqfa$4@dont-email.me> <vl8otk$3splv$3@dont-email.me> <vl8qm7$3u6t2$1@dont-email.me> <vl93dl$3vkun$1@dont-email.me> <vl9449$3vo6h$3@dont-email.me> <vl9aov$pp7$1@dont-email.me> <vla4hr$5n4v$1@dont-email.me> <vlblqj$harb$1@dont-email.me> <lttopaFoh2cU8@mid.individual.net> <vle8uk$12sii$2@dont-email.me> <c686fb74-4fac-0809-7005-417c76ee0e3b@example.net> <nbReP.633803$oR74.271654@fx16.iad> <2e17ec15-582f-5a71-84e5-d4d490274270@example.net> <vlj20k$25740$9@dont-email.me> <7454fa51-3534-2584-2197-90613efb2091@example.net> <q0925lxllh.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2801155"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <q0925lxllh.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:64065



On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, Carlos E.R. wrote:

> On 2025-01-08 10:54, D wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> 
>>> On 07/01/2025 10:43, D wrote:
>>>> Cooling kills 10x the people than warming. That is how cooling is worse 
>>>> than warming. As for lack of water, desalination exists and works well. 
>>>> Desalination can be combined excellently, with solar power to drive down 
>>>> cost.
>>>> 
>>> It is suitable for intermittent sources, yes. Nuclear is even better.
>> 
>> This is the truth! But I am curious if solar would be a good option in say, 
>> southern spain to drive desalination, and in order to build the plants 
>> quicker, due to the politicians doing their best to still stop nuclear with 
>> the power of various regulations?
>
> You forget that it is the people who do not want nuclear. It is proven 
> dangerous.

This is factually incorrect. If you cound the nr of dead, coal, hydro and 
solar have all killed more people than nuclear.

Remember the death count at Fukushima due to radiation... it is firmly at 
0.