Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:10:09 +0200
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a25ea8f3-8959-2ef1-650b-27e420344c71@example.net>
References: <v7s9sq$15lt7$1@paganini.bofh.team> <0CroO.19369$5Mb7.5869@fx47.iad> <f64e39f3-9658-6b24-a539-6b00683eb2f9@example.net> <LquoO.7838$eTp.2732@fx35.iad> <97c38cdf-b2b7-653f-9fcd-ceb802e44d94@example.net> <waAoO.71606$xYQc.31761@fx12.iad> <bgk5ajpje71muposih62a6098ltdmea7sl@4ax.com> <40d299e1-1e00-fb43-58df-e21214c51b50@example.net> <20240726103751.569fba858dab3cd1fb937688@eircom.net> <660d2b28-3226-5f4d-b94f-4fc6b25d129e@example.net> <20240726181801.0cafb11465ab1a84f8fb8957@eircom.net> <v80uhg$2vmhn$2@dont-email.me> <v81474$30lpf$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="521524"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
In-Reply-To: <v81474$30lpf$2@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:661107 comp.os.linux.misc:57289 alt.folklore.computers:226051



On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> The Natural Philosopher wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 26/07/2024 18:18, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> 	That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>>>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>>>
>>> 	About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.
>>>
>> Actually it is.
>
> It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
> investigations.

Yep, very easy. Do you have a Y, male, do you not have a Y, female. 
Problem solved!