Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Helmut@Hullen.de (Helmut Hullen) Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? Date: 03 Apr 2011 17:15:00 +0200 Organization: Hullen BS Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: individual.net 70DZ4v2gtQbfrPWDrEot5QrNcwyTew7JUiD+BX3asqoFUBfHZ5 Cancel-Lock: sha1:9F0QxelCA6q5skpeE3EICQB0DE4= User-Agent: OpenXP/4.10.7372 (Win32) (i386) Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.misc:585 Hallo, Douglas, Du meintest am 03.04.11: >> OK, perhaps the initrd & vmlinuz must be 'created together' since >> the driver routines don't have standard locations .. and initrd must >> be 'linked' to vmlinuz ? [...] > The "modular" kernel requires an initrd. No - "that depends". You can build a kernel with some "built in" modules for booting into runlevel 1, and all the modules only needed in higher runlevels (6 excluded) can be loaded without the help of an init-ramdisk. Viele Gruesse Helmut "Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".