Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:46:01 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <901ce06c-7685-6af8-de05-b5ccc7e29b43@example.net> References: <_hycnQxlN5kAphr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <36bf96a5-527c-1d8b-a93b-6788cdd589a2@example.net> <1PKcna3Yf6vdFhX6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <7b19252d-bfe8-9d48-0cd2-eb33e4a64179@example.net> <67897bb3@news.ausics.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="4039570"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:64524 On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 17/01/2025 09:20, D wrote: >> I wonder if linux + modern work such as spreadsheets and audio/video calls >> would be possible on those minimum-power ARM chips or if they are too slow? > > I do not know how true this is, but by suspicion is that if you could take a > Pi and underclock it by about 1000, it might prove alarmingly economical > > Speradsheets would be no problem but processing video takes a shit load of > CPU. Yes, this is the truth! And as web camera resolutions increase, it gets worse and worse.