Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Kohlbach Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Is It Time To Replace SSH ??? Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 21:48:14 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: <877cxpg7bl.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="23f562d1ed0e2bbcced6b7c55dff7ccd"; logging-data="1868847"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187vpLBU07AHdLRa8vQdmWw" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DHxx3HTvp7JZYg3+X3+JbHTM1FM= sha1:NGb2ShDNQz8ejnX3G6r2VNuSFpc= X-No-Archive: Yes Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:36678 On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:03:45 -0000 (UTC), Rich wrote: > > Kenny McCormack wrote: >> In article , >> Popping Mad wrote: >>>On 12/27/22 00:20, 26C.Z969 wrote: >>>> Decided to write my own replacement. It won't >>>> be freeware ... >>> >>>good luck >> >> Was it ever established just what OP's complaint against ssh was (is)? > > Not really. > > The closest it seemed the group got was that the complaint was that > /sbin/sshd itself did not incorporate an AI version of fail2ban that > would /somehow/ be able to block DDOS attacks against port 22. The OP apparently didn't understood the "one job one tool" idea in Linux. -- Andreas