Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:04:20 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <85e5fe11-2cbe-0e26-d861-8922a9d780f0@example.net>
References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me> <vlblqj$harb$1@dont-email.me> <lttopaFoh2cU8@mid.individual.net> <vle8uk$12sii$2@dont-email.me> <c686fb74-4fac-0809-7005-417c76ee0e3b@example.net> <nbReP.633803$oR74.271654@fx16.iad> <vlgrb0$1lsdi$1@dont-email.me> <4RVeP.812124$bYV2.164030@fx17.iad> <vlh9oi$1oqb2$1@dont-email.me> <vlhhes$1q4t2$2@dont-email.me> <RWYeP.56817$vfee.53192@fx45.iad> <vljb2o$27g6v$5@dont-email.me> <XHafP.16926$G93a.13818@fx05.iad> <vljkk3$29dna$3@dont-email.me> <kVcfP.505626$0O61.228231@fx15.iad> <vljqt8$2amtn$2@dont-email.me> <YoefP.510691$0O61.490083@fx15.iad> <vlk57d$2cdm4$1@dont-email.me> <vlk6g4$2cqe6$4@dont-email.me> <vllp46$2ouqc$3@dont-email.me> <vllqgf$2p071$6@dont-email.me> <vlltsf$2pqit$4@dont-email.me> <vlm0br$2q8uf$2@dont-email.me> <vlm63r$2re12$2@dont-email.me> <vlm91k$2rt0b$1@dont-email.me> <lu7pgpFesqtU1@mid.individual.net> <70506569-3453-b208-a5c8-688ba7138642@example.net> <vlp5s2$3fpg0$11@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1532407356-1736597062=:3211"
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3092439"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vlp5s2$3fpg0$11@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:64145

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323328-1532407356-1736597062=:3211
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT



On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 09/01/2025 16:56, D wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:27:32 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You're racist for even talking about it!  :-D
>>>> 
>>>> "Coloured folks?"
>>> 
>>> Who came up with BIPOC? Or NAACP for that matter? By the time I was a kid
>>> 'colored' was out and 'negro' was in. Now we're back to 'people of color'?
>>> That means they're colored, right?
>>> 
>> 
>> This is the truth! I remember when I was in school, the english teacher 
>> liked negro, while the german teacher said that was racist and preferred 
>> colored.
>> 
>> I stuck with the negro. I've made my choice! ;)
> Ive always felt colored to be more offensive than nigger, and negro probably 
> the least offensiive term, but its all stupid. Ive heard nigger both used as 
> a term of endearment and as a term to describe a stupid black person as well 
> - by blacks.
> In this country as in Africa, if you want to refer to anything, you probably 
> use a far more detailed description. Like afro carribean, or Pakistani, or 
> Indian, or Chinese, or arab, or Welsh or Scottish, or Irish...or 
> Iranian...Because no way does one word cover everything that isn't 'just like 
> you'

There is also the mysterious "nigga" I've not yet come to terms with it.
--8323328-1532407356-1736597062=:3211--