Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:50:12 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <73da3d81-b404-2783-a588-9436c93ebd51@example.net> References: <4RVeP.812124$bYV2.164030@fx17.iad> <6uarnjlv2p62sue1nt4doj5mvauapb7vpd@4ax.com> <63ea223b-3ecb-182e-de94-7beb8ee94879@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1597852108-1736441414=:3211" Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2800821"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:64062 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1597852108-1736441414=:3211 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 08/01/2025 10:16, D wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025, -hh wrote: >> >>> On 1/7/25 5:35 PM, chrisv wrote: >>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> >>>>> Adios. You've been down this road before. >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOAUsvVhgsU >>>> >>>> Here's an excellant documentary on climate change.  An hour and 20 >>>> minutes of quality information. >>> >>> Where its so-called "quality" is that its already been debunked: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'd bet money that Chris A won't watch it. >>> >>> Why waste 80 minutes watching something when a 3 minute Google search >>> affords one the salient insight on its lack of veracity? >>> >>> >>> -hh >> >> Actually, that is the best proof you can find that the movie is on to >> something. If it would be mainstream, no one would bother writing a line, >> or if it would be made by the climate royalty, it would be hyped by CNN & >> Co. >> >> Thank you, now I will definitely watch it! =) > > If anyone is in a position to debunk skeptical science it is me. > > The very first post I made using a different than usual nom de guerre, > criticising not climate change, but renewable energy, Skepticalscience > informed me and the public, to my surprise that I was a 'well known climate > denier ' whose ideas had 'already been debunked by skeptical science'. > > Skepticalscience.com is a well known climate denial site pushing fake > information to support a false climate narrative. It isn't skeptical and it > certainly isn't sciencee. It is pure AgitProp left wing propaganda I wouldn't expect anything else from a web site called "skeptical" science. --8323328-1597852108-1736441414=:3211--