Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The Joy of *small* business
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 12:24:53 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <72616cd8-3cd6-8e7a-2fe0-3078e6a2e899@example.net>
References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <slrnvltomo.32d7h.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <ls8q31F8i1nU2@mid.individual.net> <b6418115-7645-8dd3-30e3-304dee2375cd@example.net> <vducnSQpyvFJKcL6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lsbjodFn55gU9@mid.individual.net> <uaydnVxLl7sdQ_36nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1248675b-e38a-04a7-93b3-6fa527725858@example.net> <vjrjnh$1mjo7$7@dont-email.me> <lse9fqF5ikfU10@mid.individual.net> <WsOcnaUN_rSgxf_6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vju6fv$2832d$2@dont-email.me> <J02dnXgXafNlPf76nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vk0rob$2q5m4$8@dont-email.me> <DF-dnRQm_J3MtPj6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <wwv7c7upv9j.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <rZOdnUROG7pLw_v6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com> <wwvplllmkdo.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <hLycnXYJh5xBHPr6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lspnd5Fpd5U1@mid.individual.net> <QuydnT2QrdBxJvr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lsq4iuF2ubgU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="4094752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
In-Reply-To: <lsq4iuF2ubgU2@mid.individual.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:62901



On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:12:43 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>
>>    Those poor people ... caught between an ever-growing mountain of
>>    facts/evidence and equally-persuasive *belief* (which requires no
>>    facts). They TRY to find ways to splice it all together. It doesn't
>>    work well ...
>
> A friend was a Young Earther despite being a proficient programmer. Given
> the premise God can do anything it's no problem for him to whip up the
> Grand Canyon with all its geological layers in his spare time. He was also
> well rehearsed in the creationist arguments against evolution.

Did you ever get anywhere with him in arguments, or was every argument 
closed down by the "God"-argument?