Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:15:36 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <7221efe0-935e-976d-9037-2bc7f9c0b69a@example.net> References: <9eb45192-e996-fa3d-b002-c02798bb2b7a@example.net> <7Gq5P.102876$7FA3.79818@fx13.iad> <5d39f504-e3f6-3830-a9fc-fc79cf7fc557@example.net> <7f2839d0-5a8e-bf06-911c-dadbd2c195b5@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1342540367-1733933738=:16136" Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2367999"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:62207 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1342540367-1733933738=:16136 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 11 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 11/12/2024 10:06, D wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:57:36 +0100, D wrote: >>> >>>> The government owner power company at first refused to consider nuclear, >>>> since it was not economically feasible. The CEO was switftly removed by >>>> the new government, or she was forcefully instructed behind closed doors >>>> (don't remember which actually) and all of a sudden they reluctantly >>>> agreed to consider it. >>> >>> That will be a hurdle in the US; quite a few nuclear plants were >>> decommissioned because they proved to be economically unfeasible. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rancho_Seco_Nuclear_Generating_Station >>> >>> There was great weeping when Rancho Seco shut down and SMUD had to >>> restructure their generation capacity. That was replaced by sighs of >>> relief when SMUD realized they would have been destroyed by the energy >>> deregulation fiasco. >>> >> >> Lo and behold... (or talking about the trolls, to imperfectly translate a >> swedish saying...) from todays mainstream news on the topic of swedish >> nuclear: >> >> "The planned new nuclear power reactors at Ringhals cannot be accommodated. >> In any case, not if the nature reserve on the Väröhalvön is to continue. >> > ... > Sizewell nuclear power station is right next door to a major bird sanctuary > (Minsmere) > It's due to have another big reactor built alongside. > > You can cite that if you like... at any hearings. I don't live in the country since many years, so not a problem of mine. I do follow current events though. --8323328-1342540367-1733933738=:16136--