Message-ID: <67a59caa@news.ausics.net> From: Computer Nerd Kev Subject: Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <2d7ff7c3-5aa6-acff-bf69-8aee193ce9ac@example.net> <38799da0-b66c-ef55-675c-b1b1068c4452@example.net> <12f8009a-b8a0-9f85-ba66-508512e93ab4@example.net> <67a28066@news.ausics.net> <5hqb7lxb81.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <67a51b61@news.ausics.net> <9IudneM3jY3V4zj6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i686)) NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net Date: 7 Feb 2025 15:39:55 +1000 Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net Lines: 29 X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net Path: csiph.com!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:65244 WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 2/6/25 3:28 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 06/02/2025 03:19, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> Anyway, sorry, I just CAN'T see any sort of useful >>>> and safe vacuum blimp. One goose bumps into the >>>> thing and it will all implode in an instant. >>>> >>> This is substantially correct. The strength to weigh ratio of a vacuum >>> filled blimp or dirigible means it probably cannot exist at any useable >>> size >> >> If you can make small vacuum balls that float in the air, you >> could potentially fill a blimp with them instead of gas. Or >> instead of one hollow vacuum chamber, join the balls (or honeycomb >> segments) up into one solid lighter-than-air structure of tiny >> sealed vacuum chambers where only the outer ones are vulnerable >> to impact. > > > But ONE little dent compromising the structural > integrity and ...... And the rest of the sealed balls/segments still keep the thing up, that was my point. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#