Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:04:25 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <6479ece9-d714-69f9-00a8-f0aa7f30e16c@example.net>
References: <PPqcnbhZjMZRSQf6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <h-ydnfsQkJD1xAb6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <vnfm5a$2tl1t$1@dont-email.me> <2d7ff7c3-5aa6-acff-bf69-8aee193ce9ac@example.net> <b53v6lxjp9.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <e390e74e-e7e4-b4fb-b8de-2cf67e449ef0@example.net> <m05phjFfqe7U6@mid.individual.net> <38799da0-b66c-ef55-675c-b1b1068c4452@example.net> <s7l17lxehq.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <m07bihFnopbU2@mid.individual.net> <c1vnP.1215252$EYNf.437821@fx11.iad> <slrnvpt1lt.1bfl5.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <b9661fdd-285e-ba5c-0633-98e9519bef2b@example.net> <sv2dnWWcrPuQtz36nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@earthlink.com> <fbbc4315-8fa9-9348-b5e7-2d7651bab364@example.net> <iCmdnVNZXNxYGzz6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <12f8009a-b8a0-9f85-ba66-508512e93ab4@example.net> <67a28066@news.ausics.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2780097"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <67a28066@news.ausics.net>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:65223



On Tue, 5 Feb 2025, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>  Zeps are technically "better", but the framework
>>>  is subject to stress and can snap - even if it
>>>  was upgraded to titanium. Blimps spread the load
>>>  across the entire envelope and can thus survive
>>>  sudden wind gusts better. They may kinda fold
>>>  and shimmy, but don't snap.
>>>
>>>  Hmmmm ... maybe a 'hybrid' is possible now -
>>>  a blimp, but 'stiffened' a bit with like
>>>  graphite ribs so it's not SO floppy ?
>>
>> I heard about an experimental concept that does not use a gas for lift,
>> but vacuum! Very fascinating!
>
> More theoretical than experimental - the materials might be
> possible but I don't think anyone can make them yet.

This is the truth!