Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:38:41 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <58b0a0fb-a119-c488-492f-0badef58ee89@example.net> References: <20241120161842.00001d3b@gmail.com> <6c7a8f55-ca87-1459-c42e-67d0275f9ea9@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3540030"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:61188 On Thu, 21 Nov 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:52:27 +0100, D wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, John Ames wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:35:47 +0800 Woozy Song >>> wrote: >>> >>>> 1000 watts TDP? >>>> Seems just making more powerful chips by brute force has to end >>>> soon. >>> >>> We can't stop *now,* we've poured too much money into it...! >>> >>> >>> >> Anyone here shorting nvidia? Seems like a nice little bubble is building >> up there. > > I don't do stocks but that seems like a good bet. AMD and others are > coming from behind and may be able to supplant CUDA. > I think once the LLM:s are exhausted and we no longer see significant gains, might be a good time to start.