Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:41:33 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <4ae0f00a-9957-7103-2e87-23be71ae6180@example.net> References: <_OmcnZpYmdE-PYX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <20241025153958.0000222f@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="4101373"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:675523 comp.os.linux.misc:60177 On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 28/10/2024 03:20, candycanearter07 wrote: >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote at 23:43 this Friday (GMT): >>> On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:39:58 -0700, John Ames wrote: >>> >>>> In fact, you can never be truly certain of anything at all! >>> >>> Can you be certain of that? >> >> >> Certainly maybe. > The one irrefutable fact is that there are, with this exception, no > irrefutable facts. But this is of course a meta-fact in a different dimension That is also not certain, because if you doubt, then there is always the possibility of you not typing the right words, and you not actually saying what you think you are saying. But solipsism fortunately, is a dead end, not much discussed, except by mad men, who somehow do seem to refute it by their own arguing.