Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 21:22:29 +0200
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <38bfda50-3c2b-c56d-22a6-5a971513ffc3@example.net>
References: <v1941f$24d4m$1@dont-email.me> <v1a0j2$2eb40$1@dont-email.me> <l9ris7F74e0U1@mid.individual.net> <v1ac52$2gs3r$2@dont-email.me> <l9so4sFbj9uU2@mid.individual.net> <v1bril$1bh$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <wwvv83p4p45.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <v1dusa$q8t$2@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <wwvwmo5nuwi.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <v1fic8$3st0e$2@dont-email.me> <v1goh2$5t3j$4@dont-email.me> <v1iduh$kv8v$2@dont-email.me> <v1jjub$tpl5$2@dont-email.me> <v1lh8f$1eir6$2@dont-email.me> <v1m39g$1iq5v$2@dont-email.me> <v1n8ir$1u3jq$3@dont-email.me> <v1nbb4$1unbv$1@dont-email.me> <v1ncug$1v239$1@dont-email.me> <v1p1ol$2ake7$2@dont-email.me> <v1p3ug$2bbun$2@dont-email.me> <v1pa1j$2g5ao$5@dont-email.me> <2286caf6-3612-4aaa-c902-748173b21881@example.net> <v1r9ud$2vljb$5@dont-email.me> <8b013594-62eb-f74c-1ff4-1050305f2445@example.net> <v1u56n$3nmqc$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1137458550-1715714552=:8193"
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1102628"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
In-Reply-To: <v1u56n$3nmqc$2@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:56404

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323328-1137458550-1715714552=:8193
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT



On Mon, 13 May 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Mon, 13 May 2024 11:42:39 +0200, D wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 12 May 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 12 May 2024 12:51:38 +0200, D wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could it be that part of the increase is compensating for years when
>>>> rates increased with less than the inflation?
>>>
>>> Why do you think Texas is particularly hard hit?
>>>
>> You tell me.
>
> Gives the lie to that business about “socialist politicians”, doesn’t it?
>

Of course not.
--8323328-1137458550-1715714552=:8193--