Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:47:30 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <2e89d29e-4d1a-fb8e-45ed-dae0a2cf83b1@example.net>
References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me> <gJScP.13176$XfF8.10959@fx04.iad> <FEYcP.131275$aTp4.70494@fx09.iad> <35a09fa5-08b1-8121-51c7-28d3aac1cd0f@example.net> <CaidP.24348$DPp5.20979@fx01.iad> <3002e7b9-095e-c292-1202-b151f7776587@example.net> <ltmbcmFjcgpU1@mid.individual.net> <ba6263f8-1e7f-5eb1-ae06-757f2ed7a018@example.net> <lto9qbFso18U3@mid.individual.net> <slrnvnegk1.2cl6d.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <8b262a1f-507f-ef10-e4d3-a981dca5b7d1@example.net> <vl8jdq$3st6d$1@dont-email.me> <vl8jul$3sqfa$4@dont-email.me> <vl8otk$3splv$3@dont-email.me> <vl8qm7$3u6t2$1@dont-email.me> <vl93dl$3vkun$1@dont-email.me> <vl9449$3vo6h$3@dont-email.me> <vl9aov$pp7$1@dont-email.me> <vla4hr$5n4v$1@dont-email.me> <vlblqj$harb$1@dont-email.me> <lttopaFoh2cU8@mid.individual.net> <vle8uk$12sii$2@dont-email.me> <c686fb74-4fac-0809-7005-417c76ee0e3b@example.net> <nbReP.633803$oR74.271654@fx16.iad> <vlgrb0$1lsdi$1@dont-email.me> <4RVeP.812124$bYV2.164030@fx17.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2432546"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <4RVeP.812124$bYV2.164030@fx17.iad>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:63919



On Mon, 6 Jan 2025, Andrzej Matuch wrote:

> On 2025-01-06 10:02, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 06/01/2025 13:49, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>> The way they sell it, warming means a lesser availability of fresh water. 
>>> Obviously, this would result in people dying. With cooling though, there 
>>> would be a decreased availability of food in general, so I don't see how 
>>> one is worse than the other.
>> 
>> Except the narrative says that all of greenland will melt. That's a fuck of 
>> a lot of fresh water
>
> If all of Greenland will melt, the people who are suddenly inconvenienced by 
> the world's warming could move there and turn the continent-like country into 
> something inhabitable for the first time in thousands of years. I imagine 
> that as a result of it never really being used for agriculture, that land is 
> incredibly fertile.

As a bonus, that would serve as an excellent example of adapting to the 
environment, which has been a recipe for success for atleast 10000 years! 
Much better than, say, trying to control the global weather.