Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 18:44:13 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <2d7ff7c3-5aa6-acff-bf69-8aee193ce9ac@example.net>
References: <PPqcnbhZjMZRSQf6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <h-ydnfsQkJD1xAb6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <vnfm5a$2tl1t$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1895654"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
In-Reply-To: <vnfm5a$2tl1t$1@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:64999



On Thu, 30 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 30/01/2025 10:50, Andy Burns wrote:
>> Because the Daily Mail and DownDetector are *such* good tools compared to 
>> the 365 service health page? (which shows no current or recent problems of 
>> that type).
>
> Almost certainly.  Admitting to faults can cost a large company serious money 
> if the customers are on service guarantee contracts
>> 
>> <https://admin.cloud.microsoft/?#/servicehealth/history>
>> 
>> requires login ...
>
> Well that's no effing good is it?

Indeed. Useless, like all of microsofts products.