Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #80689
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Gnome 49 |
| Date | Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:58:30 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 22 |
| Message-ID | <20260107095830.0000375e@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10bejip$35i1j$7@dont-email.me> <8pqtqlx55l.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10bhj25$3v8sp$3@dont-email.me> <e52uqlxh4b.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10bio75$7g8d$3@dont-email.me> <tb8vqlxaj3.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10bj2q5$alf2$1@dont-email.me> <prgvqlx4tu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10bjl97$fqn5$1@dont-email.me> <2k40rlxp76.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <20251001104859.00004fce@gmail.com> <10bjr55$hfmk$1@dont-email.me> <10blj8s$tng3$1@dont-email.me> <20251002074617.000014c3@gmail.com> <10breee$2hofe$3@dont-email.me> <20251006084154.000054fa@gmail.com> <10jks0c$dneh$1@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 07 Jan 2026 17:58:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="041815ca2684c24c1f116d0929ddb6f9"; logging-data="863688"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18l5NwW2hPxy48kn5W5/NnrmG791Fnh2eo=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:RMlKkYMxVtxZ/W7o95l+/ggnD+g= |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:80689 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 05:46:52 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > > ... even as they propose to unilaterally replace an existing system > > Gee, I wonder who gave them the power to do that? I gather that other folks here would point to something that begins with "Red" and ends with "Hat," but for myself I'm content to point and laugh at the antics of diva developers who literally spent a year pushing back on the idea that they should offer functionality so basic that *every other extant GUI* has it with the You Don't Need That, the This Is Actually By Design, and the Anyway That's Not Possible lines of argument... ...only to back down sputtering when enough people maintained that they *did* need it that they risked losing their bid for dominance, and all of a sudden it became Magically Possible After All - which they could have done *a year prior* if they weren't so pointlessly pigheaded. That's *funny,* that is.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-07 05:46 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-01-07 06:41 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-07 09:42 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-01-07 10:04 -0800
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-08 20:17 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-01-07 09:58 -0800
Re: Gnome 49 Harold Stevens <wookie@aspen.localdomain> - 2026-01-07 12:34 -0600
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-08 20:16 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-01-08 13:22 -0800
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-08 22:05 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-01-08 18:30 -0800
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-09 04:59 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-01-08 22:24 -0800
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-09 18:31 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-01-09 10:51 -0800
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-09 22:16 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-13 11:41 +0100
Re: Gnome 49 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-01-13 08:08 -0800
Re: Gnome 49 Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-01-10 14:42 +0000
Re: Gnome 49 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-10 21:07 +0000
csiph-web