Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Ames Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The Web (HTML) Sux Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 15:37:25 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <20251222153725.000058b6@gmail.com> References: <10i7khm$2e0ab$3@dont-email.me> <10i8lit$2ltf1$1@dont-email.me> <10i8u2b$2p3ha$1@dont-email.me> <69487137@news.ausics.net> <20251222135823.000042ea@gmail.com> <10icgk7$3rvck$1@dont-email.me> <20251222144314.000060d0@gmail.com> <10icj90$3snlp$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 23:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c961a7da74c6a27e63b6c95757f32d10"; logging-data="4073296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Sh4rFrN16nXXrYnOZ2DOnzltc2jxpEh8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:WbD5i/ZrVLzni3ci9Qby0pxJsf0= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:79710 On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 23:12:32 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D=E2=80=99Oliveiro wrote: > >> This is why browsers allow you to override site style definitions > >> with your own. =20 > > > > Yes, but it would be very much nicer if that wasn't *necessary.* =20 >=20 > On the contrary. This is an integral part of the whole concept of > separating form from content. Separation of form from content does *not* mean that web designers are obligated to use overwrought, kludgy, or abusive design patterns that the user then has to direct their browser to ignore. That's an absurd thing to say.