Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Ames Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: More systemdCrap Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:07:01 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <20250312090701.00000ef9@gmail.com> References: <20250310152856.00004b5a@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:07:04 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="486a67353bc0ecf66feb3ad3b8881de1"; logging-data="2811087"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XAWRgGtJXyj984PUqlwwqTk6UGBoWf8U=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:9HvmlWyq5f6MtA83kiKjbQ8G7wY= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:66320 On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:44:41 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > > And I am sure the first thing any hacker would do would be to write > > a decent journalctl that would erase his presence selectively > > But they cannot digitally sign the result with the right key, can > they? Which, again, undermines the argument that adding purge-by-source would irreparably compromise auditability.