Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #62624

Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:02:52 -0000 (UTC)
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

> >> The amount of data you can transfer over a pipe is not in any way 
> >> limited by system memory size or any other system imposed limits.  
> > 
> > Quite. I’m not sure why this discussion has restarted but it was
> > clear from last time round that some of the participants don’t know
> > what a pipe is, and aren’t particularly interested in finding out.  
> 
> Yes, our local nymshift troll seems to clearly not know what a pipe
> is, nor care to learn either.

I *think* what he's meaning to say is this: while you can transfer any
arbitrary amount of data *through* a pipe, there is an upper limit to
how much you can have *in* a pipe at any one time; eventually, you hit
either *A.* an OS-imposed limit on buffer size, at which point things
start blocking as already discussed, or *B.* the upper bounds of system
memory, at which point the system will either start swapping (in which
case you lose any speed advantage) or blocking (as with limited buffer
size.)

That said, what probably shouldn't need saying here is that if you're
filling up all available space in a pipe such that you're regularly
hitting these limits, you're probably doing pipes wrong.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? rlhamil@smart.net (Richard L. Hamilton) - 2024-12-14 08:06 +0000
  Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-14 10:10 +0000
    Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2024-12-14 15:54 +0000
      Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 16:06 +0000
        Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-12-17 13:34 +0000
          Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-18 01:23 +0000
            Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-17 23:25 -0500
              Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-18 05:01 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-18 05:12 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-18 14:03 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-19 04:27 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 14:07 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 16:02 +0100
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 08:27 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-18 14:02 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 08:11 -0800
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-18 16:51 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 18:32 +0000

csiph-web