Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #58920
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System |
| Date | Wed, 2 Oct 2024 09:15:02 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 33 |
| Message-ID | <20241002091502.00004cde@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Sp-dnfn-SI4ibmH7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 02 Oct 2024 18:15:06 +0200 (CEST) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="54277be2e80a74f6361db4182f2c954a"; logging-data="3431927"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8H5gDLkAwGtooltbKYfb+7uMb2Q1dp2g=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:a/hhi9WNmSEQk6bGVCi6rCqwlDs= |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-w64-mingw32) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:58920 alt.folklore.computers:227413 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 03:18:23 -0400 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > The 990 series used the TMS-9900 chip and near variants. This was an > odd chip - kept the CPU registers out in ordinary RAM and could > switch quickly between different sets of registers. At that time, the > external RAM and CPU kinda ran at the same speed so little was lost > putting the registers in RAM. > > I remember fooling with this chip on a TI-99/4a home computer (which, > tragically, horribly under-used the neat new 16-bit CPU). There were > ASM commands for dealing with the register, 'context', shifting. By > that means many users with their own space could be implemented > directly with the hardware. I've always found the 9900 concept interesting, although its core assumption about memory speed doesn't really hold up today; much of the architecture was eventually reincarnated in TI's MSP430 series micro- controllers, but they ditched the memory-resident register file. But for the time, context-switching certainly didn't get any faster than that; only three actual registers to save, but you still got a comfortably PDP-11ish environment from the programmer's perspective. But yes, it's astonishing just how bad the TI-99 design was; a cascade of bad decisions that turned what could've been a real contender in the home-computer wars into an absolute joke. One of my oneathesedays projects that I've toyed with for years (though never made any headway on) is to roll up a homebrew system that does right by the concept... > How it is now AIN'T how it always was. And may it never be forgotten ;)
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-02 03:18 -0400
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 09:15 -0700
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 09:21 -0700
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-02 16:35 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 09:49 -0700
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-02 22:28 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 15:59 -0700
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2024-10-02 18:07 -0700
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-03 01:46 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2024-10-02 18:07 -0700
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2024-10-03 16:27 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-03 21:44 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-10-02 16:43 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-02 17:59 +0100
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-02 22:28 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2024-10-02 18:07 -0700
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-03 01:38 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2024-10-03 16:34 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-10-03 17:02 +0000
Re: The "Good" Old Days - Complete Specs for DX-10 Operating System scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2024-10-03 21:54 +0000
csiph-web