Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #75838
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Floppies - Actual Question |
| Date | 2025-10-09 12:45 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <10c8788$2kf2m$6@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <af-dncNqL6mEbHj1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <umlhrlxmm6.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <cards-20251008130855@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <10c5kqp$1j0pj$1@dont-email.me> <slrn10ee9rk.7di.spamtrap42@one.localnet> |
On 09/10/2025 04:09, Robert Riches wrote: > On 2025-10-08, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 08/10/2025 13:10, Stefan Ram wrote: >>> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote or quoted: >>>> There was no urban legend in those years, floppies were a recent >>>> invention. We simply did not know. We invented the urban legends. >>> >>> Some people around here are walking around with those >>> RFID cards today, and they're thinking about wrapping >>> them in aluminum foil to make it harder to scan them. >>> >>> >> That may well be true > > Did the test. > > My second-to-most-recent emplyer had NFC/RFID badge cards that > each employee was required to scan at the lobby when entering a > facility. For the test of one of the metal-lined sleeves, I > asked the "guard" at the desk for permission to test the sleeve > by doing an experiment to see whether the ID badge card could be > read while inside the sleeve. The "guard" said he would watch > his monitor while I attempted to scan the sleeved badge card. He > said his system could not see that the badge card existed while > it was in the sleeve. Outside the sleeve, the badge card worked > perfectly. > > Based on that test, it appears that sleeve was sufficient to > sheild at least the type of NFC/RFID used in that badge card. > Good. My time designing radios inside tin boxes was not wasted then! Irrelevant factoid. Back when I was involved in professional RF design, there was a rule of thumb, which more or less said 'you will never get a design stable unless it has less gain that 20 dB per inch of separation between stages'. It was surprisingly accurate. But then we started needing to pack all this stuff into small guided missiles, and as the parts got smaller so did the permissible separation. Then we started building little tin walls round each stage and got it even smaller...and when ICs game along they were so small that the radiation coupling between input and output was soi low that they could cram 60dB into a single chip. Tinfoil blocks RF. Juts come to my house which uses foil backed plasterboard everywhere. we ordered some for the bathrooms and over ordered so we used it everywhere. Cant get a wifi signal from one room to another at all. -- “it should be clear by now to everyone that activist environmentalism (or environmental activism) is becoming a general ideology about humans, about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a 'noble' idea. It is not an honest pursuit of 'sustainable development,' a matter of elementary environmental protection, or a search for rational mechanisms designed to achieve a healthy environment. Yet things do occur that make you shake your head and remind yourself that you live neither in Joseph Stalin’s Communist era, nor in the Orwellian utopia of 1984.” Vaclav Klaus
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Floppies - Actual Question ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-10-06 10:29 +0000
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-06 22:08 +0000
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-06 23:30 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-07 15:16 +0000
Re: Floppies - Actual Question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-08 02:34 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 01:05 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-08 10:58 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 11:06 +0100
Re: Floppies - Actual Question ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-10-08 12:10 +0000
Re: Floppies - Actual Question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-08 14:14 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:44 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:10 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:36 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:54 +0100
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 01:57 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 13:49 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:29 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-11 14:32 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-10-09 12:50 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:11 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:37 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-10-10 11:19 +0200
Phone wallet "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 13:51 +0200
Re: Phone wallet c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:30 -0400
Re: Phone wallet "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-11 14:32 +0200
Re: Phone wallet c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 21:35 -0400
Re: Phone wallet "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-12 14:48 +0200
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:17 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-10 06:51 +0000
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-10 03:29 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:55 +0100
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:10 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 13:18 +0100
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-10-09 03:09 +0000
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:58 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 12:45 +0100
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-10-10 02:53 +0000
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 23:44 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:45 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:38 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-09 15:16 +0000
Faraday cages (was: Re: Floppies - Actual Question) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 17:02 +0100
Re: Faraday cages Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Faraday cages The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:49 +0100
Re: Floppies - Actual Question The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:47 +0100
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 01:05 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 01:52 -0400
Re: Floppies - Actual Question c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 01:38 -0400
csiph-web