Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:11:30 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <057f7ff0-2fda-0431-2ef8-e860a4772b69@example.net> References: <9eb45192-e996-fa3d-b002-c02798bb2b7a@example.net> <7Gq5P.102876$7FA3.79818@fx13.iad> <5d39f504-e3f6-3830-a9fc-fc79cf7fc557@example.net> <992330af-c771-9db3-7d20-deb5e0cb882d@example.net> <7896d790-e533-a390-b024-abc1edcd1c15@example.net> <253549be-ac18-daa7-6b9a-a3b41e3e91e7@example.net> <54acad70-d817-060f-5378-304258c3a1f0@example.net> <6650dffd-d5e8-0d72-0a01-ba62815a6667@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-620064057-1734199892=:17080" Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2852752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:62400 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-620064057-1734199892=:17080 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 14 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 14/12/2024 10:36, D wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> >>> I think by 2030 at least three  possibly four reactor designs will be out >>> there working commercially across Europe and SE aAsia and probably Africa >>> too. >> >> Would be excellent! As long as someone takes the first step, usually the >> rest will follow. =) > > About 12 years ago I wrote a paper detailing why I thought renewable energy > would never work except as an add on. Because in every case the nuclear power > option was cheaper *overall* and less environmentally destructive. > > It had nothing to say about climate change. I was merely looking at a future > beyond fossil fuels... > > But the moment I put it on line, using a name I had never used before in the > Internet, and put a link to it, I discovered that I was already 'a well known > climate denier' ...'in the pay of big Oil'!! > > At that point I started to look closer into climate change to see why an > independent retired engineer writing about energy should arouse such a false > response. Really? How come you were already known as a "climate denier"? Was that without your knowledge? Have you written a lot of articles or published academical papers? --8323328-620064057-1734199892=:17080--