Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #3545

Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro?

From The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.hardware, comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.setup
Subject Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro?
Date 2022-06-17 16:32 +0100
Organization A little, after lunch
Message-ID <t8i6qp$ir$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <_5qdnd_HFe138jf_nZ2dnUU7-RnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <20220615225108@news.eternal-september.org> <87edzoic84.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <t8hjh2$ktm$1@dont-email.me> <62ac6c5c@news.ausics.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 17/06/2022 12:58, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.misc The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 16/06/2022 21:29, Andreas Kohlbach wrote:
>>>
>>> For convenience, choose a distribution which has it as default. But I
>>> suppose any up to date distribution will run fine, as long a the
>>> desktop manager was chosen wisely.
>>
>> It is utterly pointless to get a 'lightweight' distro when any browser
>> invocation will immediately grab more than half the RAM.
> 
> Firefox seems to always expand to half or more of the available
> RAM, but it doesn't seem to actually ruin performance to run it
> with only 2 or 3GB so I guess it's just some sort of caching.
> 
>> If you want to run modern software at all, you need really >3GB RAM OR
>> an SSD swap disk. Or both,
>>
>> IRRESPECTIVE OF DISTRO.
> 
> Not true, I do everything with neither. Fancy desktop environments
> chew up a stupid amount of system resources making everything seem
> slow. Compare default Fedora with AntiX or Star on a slow machine
> and you'll see for yourself.
> 
As I said, if you *dont* want to run modern software like firefox or 
thunderbird, all bets are off.

Fancy desktop environments actually use surprisingly little memory over 
and above the X-windows abomination..


-- 
“People believe certain stories because everyone important tells them, 
and people tell those stories because everyone important believes them. 
Indeed, when a conventional wisdom is at its fullest strength, one’s 
agreement with that conventional wisdom becomes almost a litmus test of 
one’s suitability to be taken seriously.”

Paul Krugman

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2022-06-15 13:42 -0500
  Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? John McCue <jmccue@fuzzball.mhome.org> - 2022-06-15 20:23 +0000
  Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-06-15 23:16 +0000
    Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-06-15 18:48 -0500
      Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-06-16 02:52 +0000
        Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-16 16:29 -0400
          Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-06-17 08:17 +1000
          Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-06-16 18:01 -0500
          Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 11:03 +0100
            Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2022-06-17 21:58 +1000
              Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 16:32 +0100
              Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 16:33 +0100
                Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-06-18 10:28 +1000
            Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-06-17 17:35 +0000
            Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008 MacBook Pro? Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-06-17 20:27 +0000
    Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2022-06-15 20:13 -0400
      Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-06-16 02:56 +0000
        Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2022-06-18 19:49 +0000
  Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-16 12:19 +0100
    Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-16 16:36 -0400
      Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 10:59 +0100
        Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? "25.BX945" <25BZ495@nada.net> - 2022-06-18 20:09 -0400
  Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? "25.BX945" <25BZ495@nada.net> - 2022-06-16 22:31 -0400
  Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2022-06-18 22:44 +0200
    Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008? MacBook Pro? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-06-18 19:33 -0500
      Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008? MacBook Pro? Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2022-06-19 12:25 +0200
        Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008? MacBook Pro? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-06-19 06:31 -0500
          Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old? 2008? MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-19 13:49 +0100
            Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old?? 2008? MacBook Pro? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-06-19 09:25 -0500
              Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old?? 2008? MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-19 17:37 +0100
              Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old?? 2008? MacBook Pro? "25.BX945" <25BZ495@nada.net> - 2022-06-21 00:48 -0400
                Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old?? 2008? MacBook Pro? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 11:11 +0100
                Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old?? 2008? MacBook Pro? "25.BX945" <25BZ495@nada.net> - 2022-06-22 00:48 -0400
                Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old?? 2008? MacBook Pro? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-22 16:23 +0000
                Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old?? 2008? MacBook Pro? "25.BX946" <25BZ496@nada.net> - 2022-06-23 01:22 -0400
        Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008? MacBook Pro? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2022-06-19 09:36 -0400
  Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2022-06-25 23:59 -0500
    Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-26 01:31 -0400
      Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2022-06-26 01:42 -0500
        Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-26 23:34 -0400
  Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2022-06-27 14:13 -0500
    Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2022-06-27 14:15 -0500
    Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2022-06-27 15:59 -0400
      Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2022-06-27 18:02 -0500
        Re: What's the best low-end supported Linux to use in a very old 2008 MacBook Pro? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2022-06-27 20:54 -0400

csiph-web