Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #411
| From | ebenZEROONE@verizon.net (Hactar) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Multifunction color laser with network |
| Date | 2011-06-04 23:58 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <gfbrb8-ckb.ln1@pc.home> (permalink) |
| References | <4de2b51b$0$19122$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <94pnt5F2tuU16@mid.individual.net> <k6rqb8-opr.ln1@pc.home> <isena5$ksj$3@dont-email.me> |
In article <isena5$ksj$3@dont-email.me>, J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> wrote: > On Saturday, June 4th, 2011 at 19:20:20h -0400, Hactar wrote: > > > That can be through DHCP, as long as DHCP is tweaked to give out the > > same address every time. That's how I do every computer that's commonly > > on my LAN. > > Is that not rather pointless though? Well, if you decide to reconfigure the network, all the static assignments are in one place rather than scattered across lots of devices, most of which aren't available at any given time. For one person and a handful of devices, it's about the same amount of work as setting static addresses. For more, DHCP wins. > Why not just configure each host to assign its own static IP address > and cut out the overhead of DHCP? That overhead is only done once per address-timeout (a week, in my case), at IP-up time. It's not something that happens with every packet or anything. > Unless of course all of your hosts are laptops which go a-roaming. Some are, and that's where it's of significant benefit. Some are printers or print servers. (Actually my printer doesn't support DHCP.) -- "On two occasions I have been asked, -- 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' ... I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage, 1864.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Multifunction color laser with network Julien <serval2412@yahoo.fr> - 2011-05-29 23:05 +0200
Re: Multifunction color laser with network J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-29 23:49 +0000
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Aragorn <aragorn@chatfactory.invalid> - 2011-05-30 02:03 +0200
Re: Multifunction color laser with network ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-05-30 01:11 +0000
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Andreas Dehmel <blackhole.8.zarquon42@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-05-30 20:02 +0200
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Julien <serval2412@yahoo.fr> - 2011-05-31 23:38 +0200
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Richard Corden <richard.corden@gmail.com> - 2011-06-02 10:05 +0200
Re: Multifunction color laser with network ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-06-02 15:17 +0000
Re: Multifunction color laser with network ebenZEROONE@verizon.net (Hactar) - 2011-06-04 19:20 -0400
Re: Multifunction color laser with network J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-06-05 01:48 +0000
Re: Multifunction color laser with network ebenZEROONE@verizon.net (Hactar) - 2011-06-04 23:58 -0400
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Richard Corden <richard.corden@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 10:10 +0200
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Mark Hobley <markhobley@yahoo.donottypethisbit.co> - 2011-06-08 17:44 +0000
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Joe Beanfish <joe@nospam.duh> - 2011-06-03 11:25 -0400
Re: Multifunction color laser with network ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-06-03 16:19 +0000
Re: Multifunction color laser with network Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2011-06-04 12:17 +0000
csiph-web