Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #924

Re: Addressing on I2C

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded, comp.os.linux.embedded
Subject Re: Addressing on I2C
Date 2021-03-19 11:28 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <s31ubn$ad2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <s31nl6$1vf2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <s31pk2$9pb$1@dont-email.me> <nnd$7558435a$1bff445a@67921790045d0e94>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 19/03/2021 10:37, Stef wrote:
> On 2021-03-19 David Brown wrote in comp.arch.embedded:
>> On 19/03/2021 09:33, ZOT wrote:
>>> Are they some 'reserved' 'well known' addresses on i2c?
>>
>> No.  You only have 7 bits for the address - that is too small a range to
>> be able to reserve addresses for particular purposes.
> 
> And even in that small range, there are reserved and allocated addresses,
> see other post.
> 

I stand corrected.  Thank you.

Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Addressing on I2C ZOT <pasmoi@pasici.us> - 2021-03-19 09:33 +0100
  Re: Addressing on I2C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-19 10:07 +0100
    Re: Addressing on I2C Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2021-03-19 10:37 +0100
      Re: Addressing on I2C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-19 11:28 +0100
  Re: Addressing on I2C Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2021-03-19 10:29 +0100

csiph-web