Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.embedded Subject: Re: Why Appil shitware failed Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:37:04 -0700 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net TAdkBBb+AatEiVTxLDqxzALVqmPCbXJe9sq495EU3WG5AWRxdn1UysvoQNAQmwlyY6 Cancel-Lock: sha1:eLC4MURpbgsGqgF6jM7uuYMC5fg= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.34.0.120813 Thread-Topic: Why Appil shitware failed Thread-Index: Ac2c53izY7/Q3sJUrUaAeuhpS+Lqaw== Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:137943 comp.os.linux.embedded:342 On 9/27/12 11:45 AM, in article B919s.11228$F52.3398@fx22.am4, "7" wrote: > Why Appil shitware failed Whatever Appil is it has not become a household name... though it sounds like it is trying to glom onto Apple's name to get recognition. That does sound like a failure to me. -- "I started Linux as a desktop operating system. And it's the only area where Linux hasn't completely taken over. That just annoys the hell out of me." -- Linus Torvalds