Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #247

Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/21/2012 4:49 PM, Hadron wrote:
> OldGoat<oats@farmerbrowns.com>  writes:
>
>> On 4/21/2012 1:45 PM, 7 wrote:
>>> Homer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Verily I say unto thee that Hardon spake thusly:
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/254097/70_arm_pc_can_run_android_and_ubuntu_linux.html>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> `Currently available for as little as $70, the Mele A1000 is a small
>>>>> ARM device that runs Android but can apparently be configured to run
>>>>> Ubuntu Linux as well.
>>>>> </quote>
>>>>
>>>> And since the GPU is a Mali 400 MP, that means the driver is Free
>>>> Software too.
>>>>
>>>> http://limadriver.org
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm eager to understand a bit of graphics controller code,
>>> so I pulled down the driver for the mali graphics controller...
>>>
>>> The ARM developer community is really a bunch of wankers:
>>>
>>> limare.c:
>>> state->pp = pp_info_create(state, state->mem_address + 0x80000,
>>> 	state->mem_physical + 0x80000,
>>> 	0x1000, state->mem_physical + 0x100000);
>>>
>>>
>>> Supposing the meaningless 0x1000 was really 0x10000
>>> So to go and fix an error in this code, the ARM developer
>>> aka super wankers will now grep for 0x1000.
>>>
>>> Doh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> The root of the blame game goes back to ARM holdings again and again
>>> and their dumbness in not coming out earlier with the CMSIS
>>> libraries, and what they have out now has been written
>>> so poorly it deserves special criticism:
>>>
>>> They wrote the CMSIS libraries with names for registers
>>> but without any names for flags within registers!!!
>>>
>>> If they don't know how to write C libraries properly, then they should
>>> be shot, or at the very least, go with begging bowl
>>> and download some microchip code for their gcc based compiler
>>> running through the Netbean IDE and look at how they have
>>> named registers and flags with their data structure so that
>>> registers can be programmed without using references to hard
>>> coded numbers in the C code.
>>>
>>>
>> Ok, I see your point on the flags issue.  It has always been a recommended
>> practice to park constants like these into a constant identifier.  At
>> least the
>
> Of course it is, but on fixed HW like this the little fraud is making a
> mountain out of a molehill. 7 "raises issues" rather than actually
> battling issues and contributing himself.

I've noticed the mountain.  Frankly, I don't understand the fuss.

>
>> code would be a bit easier to understand... plus you only have one place for the
>> constant identifier to be initialized, rather than going to every place in the
>> code in case there was a typo.
>
> Erm, yes, programming 101 and what makes it all the more laughable that
> thats what the little fraud is showing off about. Even Creepy would have
> noticed it.
>

And I noticed not one word from him either.

Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

ARM developer community a bunch of wankers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-04-21 20:45 +0100
  Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-04-21 22:36 +0200
    Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-04-21 21:57 +0100
      Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-04-21 23:02 +0200
        Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-04-21 23:11 +0200
        Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-04-21 23:38 +0100
          Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Scott Wood <scott@buserror.net> - 2012-04-23 00:35 -0500
    Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-04-21 23:06 +0200
  Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> - 2012-04-21 16:28 -0600
    Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-04-22 00:49 +0200
      Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> - 2012-04-21 23:13 -0600
  Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-22 09:22 -0400
    Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-04-22 15:03 +0100
    Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-04-22 16:24 +0200

csiph-web