Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.development.system > #410

Re: Coreutils C question

From Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject Re: Coreutils C question
Date 2012-03-21 11:30 +0000
Organization the Core
Message-ID <87obrqxkb9.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (permalink)
References <jk8gcr$ddq$1@dont-email.me> <87zkbcrprz.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <jkac30$gls$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 20 Mar 2012, Benjamin S. said:
> I also think it might be for portability reasons (cross-OS stuff). I got 
> the source from an official Linux repos (Ubuntu 10.10). I wonder whether 
> they've removed all options with regards to other OS. From what I 
> understand the coreutils package was rewritten/organized so maybe it is a 
> leftover.

It's clearly a leftover, if perhaps left around because it is plausible
that some future machine might also require constant per-utility
initialization.

-- 
NULL && (void)

Back to comp.os.linux.development.system | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Coreutils C question "Benjamin S." <niacin89@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-19 23:44 +0000
  Re: Coreutils C question Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-20 00:19 +0000
  Re: Coreutils C question Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-03-20 02:04 +0000
    Re: Coreutils C question "Benjamin S." <niacin89@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-20 16:43 +0000
      Re: Coreutils C question Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk> - 2012-03-21 11:30 +0000
  Re: Coreutils C question indrajith.k@gmail.com - 2014-09-23 06:46 -0700

csiph-web