Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: unicode bengali in different web browser
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:47:05 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <1308448025.10050.6.camel@roddur>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="FPOK25p7UEyhSiwEIkXRyA"; logging-data="9995"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185Dc0jg5HcihDySnUbmlw3"
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4NisukwxxjL7odgn5MryNeWS+gM=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.development.system:179

plz look at the site http://www.anandabazar.in/  which uses unicode
font.=20
Now, the rendering is very different in firefox(4) and epiphany. what i
first thought due to gecko and webkit. But, later I found google chrome
is also rendering it correctly, as claimed by the website.=20
I use fedora 14 with lohit font to render bengali fonts.=20
Hence, I want to know, what makes the rendering different in the
browser? Unicode fonts are supposed to be browser independent...right?