Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Todd Carnes Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps Subject: Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:38:12 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: uqlV+6kNo2Z0TnMsKGN6tA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.development.apps:78 On 04/14/2011 01:34 PM, Todd Carnes wrote: > On 04/13/2011 09:40 AM, Octavio wrote: >> Hi! >> How to use gfortran compilator to have the equivalent of an ifort one >> on Red Hat EL5.2 ? >> >> Many thanks. >> >> Octavio > > Linux is perfectly capable of compiling Fortran source without Intel's > help. > > Look at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran for an example. > > Todd > Oops, after re-reading your post, I guess you were asking about gfortran, weren't you? Sorry about that... However, I think you need to be a bit more specific in your request. what do you mean by "equivalent"? Todd