Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: threading question
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:40:19 +0000
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <87zket5gm4.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com>
References: <jcae0f$if5$1@dont-email.me> <8762hjp32c.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <jcain1$gsa$1@dont-email.me> <87wr9znmds.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <jcaldt$2il$1@dont-email.me> <et3ke7977c15sman3qbgnd0k9n7vkso92r@4ax.com> <jce4ld$arh$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: individual.net 7nLB8l4/U0Biolqvi8n1Gw64BWy7A7oCnrSuZL6LOBE6vBrB4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:E1yYjqXYkH+yNixZMiLae8GDx5k= sha1:qGny7pPlFEwH8pyawD8CuPBz5B0=
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.development.apps:331

Bill M <wpmccormick@just_about_everywhere.com> writes:
> Mark wrote, On 12/15/2011 9:19 AM:
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:12:29 -0600, Bill M
>> <wpmccormick@just_about_everywhere.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Let me ask my question a different way: What is the proper method of
>>> cleaning up threads before the main routine exits? If your previous
>>> response answers that question, maybe you could reform your response?
>>
>> Ensure that all the threads can respond to a termination request.
>> Send a termination request to all threads.
>> Call pthread_join() for each thread.
>
> Do I need to have a sigaction sa_handler for each thread?

Which part of "you are wrong and this is NOT necessary" is too
complicated for you?