Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #851

Re: Linux clone of dos editor (ide) edit.exe!!!!!!!!!!!!

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday, April 4, 1998 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, James Hebert wrote:
> Wow.
> 
> Sam, I thought that creating a setuid root, no sources provided,
> writes direct to hardware editor would be the pinacle of your
> stupidity.
> 
> At least you writing it didn't hurt me or millions of other people by
> writing it.
> 
> You now have a second feat competing for the slot of "stupidest thing
> Sam has ever done." I never thought there'd be any contest.
> 
> You posted a Base64 encoded binary to this, a non-binary,
> group. And your cross-posted it to several more!
> 
> I'm taking away your Mozilla 3.04Gold for FreeBSD and giving you
> Newswatcher for MacOS. You truly are one of the fucking morons who
> needs the little reminder "Are you sure you want to post?  Millions of
> people around the world will receive this message as a result of your
> post." You are a maggot who is proud to refuse the clues heap upon
> him, and your binary post represents tremendous, measurable, financial
> loss to everyone who pays to suck their newsfeed over a metered link.
> 
> I know that's hard to grasp, since your mom obviously pays for your
> worldlink account. You've mentioned being in school -- it's obviously
> a fantastic cs department if you need to dial up to worldnet.
> 
> Tallying up Sam's fucking shit for brains points, we see:
> 
> * Thinks he's smarter than hundreds of thousands of researchers
>   and developers that have worked on the platform since before he
>   born.
> 
> * Wants a free OS, a free compiler, a free editor that he used to write
>   the source for this peice of shit, and free help from a worldwide
>   community of developers. In return he doesn't give a flying fuck if
>   what he writes is useful to anyone but him, and actively blocks attempts
>   to find something that can benefit the community at large in his work,
>   by not releasing the sources and writing directly to hardware that he 
>   has.
> 
> * Posts with the mentality of a two year old, repeating phrases in all
>   caps several times per message in succession, punctuated with that
>   characteristic-of-all-worthless-fucks-on-usenet, the stream of
>   exc-lame-ation points.
> 
> * Posts binaries to multiple non-binary newsgroups.
> 
> * Posts anything *about* the editor to groups where it's clearly off-topic,
>   like comp.os.linux.setup.
> 
> I hope that in 9 years when you've gone through puberty, are out of
> school, and are looking for a job, that your potential employer does a
> DejaNews profile of you. It may be the only good thing to come out of
> your feeble-minded presence on usenet. I can only hope that your
> fingers aren't let anywhere near code that anyone I care about may
> ever run.
> 
> Die.
> 
> jim

this is very angry.

Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Linux clone of dos editor (ide) edit.exe!!!!!!!!!!!! james.sarasin@gmail.com - 2018-01-17 11:51 -0800
  Re: Linux clone of dos editor (ide) edit.exe!!!!!!!!!!!! Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2018-01-17 22:36 +0000

csiph-web