Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #32407 > unrolled thread

Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha...

Started byflatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
First post2011-06-12 17:09 -0400
Last post2011-06-13 05:47 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 170 — 29 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400
    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-12 17:59 -0400
      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 18:01 -0400
        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:48 +0200
          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:27 +0200
            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 10:34 +0100
              [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 06:37 -0400
                Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-13 06:50 -0400
                Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:18 +0100
                  Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0200
                    Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0100
                      Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 10:18 -0400
                    Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:29 -0400
                      Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-13 18:09 +0000
                        Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:40 -0400
                          Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:54 -0500
                            Re: [Troll] "chrisv" and liarmutt leg humping each other. one reach around away from a happy ending. "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:59 -0400
                        Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:27 +0200
                          Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-14 17:00 -0700
                Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 12:33 +0100
                Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:20 -0500
                  Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:42 -0400
                  Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 16:18 +0200
                    Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 13:07 -0400
                      Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 13:18 -0400
                      Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 19:23 +0200
                        Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 20:17 +0200
                          Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:41 -0400
                            Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-13 12:47 -0700
                              Re: Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 12:53 -0700
                            Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:50 -0500
                              Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:51 -0400
                            Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:50 +0200
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 19:24 -0400
              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-13 15:02 +0200
            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:39 +0100
              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:04 +0200
                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:24 +0100
                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:42 +0200
                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:57 +0100
                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 15:01 +0200
                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 14:12 +0100
                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:30 -0500
                            Re: Time To flush the stupid turd "chrisv".. Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:44 -0400
                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 06:20 -0700
                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 16:01 +0100
              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 13:02 +0100
                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:45 +0200
                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 23:22 +0100
                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:29 +0200
                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 02:45 +0200
                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-14 06:50 +0000
                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:13 +0200
                            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 11:08 +0200
                              [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 06:31 -0400
                                Re: [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 11:50 +0100
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 07:23 -0500
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 09:18 -0400
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:03 +0200
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:26 -0400
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 13:11 -0500
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 20:43 +0200
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:20 +0200
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 20:45 -0400
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 03:31 +0200
                                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-14 21:45 -0400
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-06-15 05:57 +0100
                                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-15 07:31 +0000
                                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 10:57 -0400
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:14 -0400
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:16 +0200
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:09 -0400
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:34 -0500
                            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:24 -0400
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 09:45 -0500
                                Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 10:47 -0400
                                  Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:54 -0400
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 10:11 -0500
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 11:15 -0400
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:23 -0500
                                    Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:02 +0200
                                      Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 18:06 +0100
                                        Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:11 -0500
                                          Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:16 -0400
                                      Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 20:29 +0200
                                    Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:14 +0200
                                      Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:21 -0400
                                      Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:10 +0100
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 15:54 +0100
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:30 +0200
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:27 +0100
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 16:12 +0000
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:09 -0400
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 00:12 +0200
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:05 +0200
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:01 +0200
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:14 -0400
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:23 +0200
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:26 -0500
                                    Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:38 -0400
                                      Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:48 -0400
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:19 +0200
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:34 -0400
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:53 +0200
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:14 +0100
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 12:33 +0200
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 17:13 +0200
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 11:59 -0400
                                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 20:33 +0200
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:37 +0200
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 00:04 +0100
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 18:11 -0500
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 00:12 +0000
                                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:32 -0700
                                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 09:07 +0000
                                            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 10:27 +0100
                                            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 11:21 -0400
                                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-16 17:54 +0200
                                                [Troll] A dope with a rope Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-16 12:55 -0400
                                                  Re: [Chris Ahlstrom] A pussy with no balls "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 13:09 -0400
                                                  Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-16 13:18 -0400
                                                  Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 18:20 +0100
                                                    Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-16 12:40 -0500
                                                      Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 14:02 -0400
                                                  Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 19:56 +0200
                                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 14:30 -0400
                                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 07:26 +0200
                                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 01:33 -0400
                                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst+usenet@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2011-06-17 11:16 +0200
                                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:31 -0400
                                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-16 15:43 +0000
                                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-17 09:35 +0000
                                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:36 -0400
                                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 16:47 +0200
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 12:50 +0100
                                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 02:15 +0200
                                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-18 10:21 +0100
                                            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 13:10 +0200
                                          Time for some scripting! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-18 06:59 -0400
                                            Re: Time for some scripting! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-18 10:40 -0400
                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:20 +0200
                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 16:11 +0200
                            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:13 +0200
                              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:10 +0200
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:28 +0100
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:40 -0500
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Rick O'Shea" <rick@invalid.com> - 2011-06-15 09:22 -0400
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 15:29 +0200
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 13:39 +0000
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 09:56 -0500
                                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 18:25 +0100
                                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 10:54 -0400
                                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 11:17 -0400
                                    Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 11:47 -0400
                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:17 +0200
                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:48 +0100
                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:56 +0200
                            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:26 +0200
                        Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:40 +0100
                          Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 19:16 +0200
                      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:36 +0100
            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:02 +0200
              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:57 +0200
                Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:15 -0500
                  Re: Time To flush the useless asshole "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:17 -0400
                  Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:22 -0500
                    Re: Time To flush useless turds like "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:48 -0400
              Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:19 -0400
            Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:16 -0500
      Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200

Page 1 of 9  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →


#32407 — Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha...

Fromflatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
Date2011-06-12 17:09 -0400
SubjectTime To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha...
Message-ID<g367mk12jqy5$.1p705wgvkga6r.dlg@40tude.net>
Crybaby Chris Ahlstrom is once again accusing me of cherry picking bad
Linux posts, as if one has to try hard to find them..hahaha...


He posted a new thread entitled :"[Troll] Yet another anti-Linux rant
cherry-picked by Flounder"

Well Chris Ahlstrom, guess where I got the orginal post entitled:

"The Linux desktop experience is killing Linux on the desktop." ????

Hmmmm, Liarmutt?

RIGHT FROM YOUR FORMER MASTER Roy Schestowitz!!!

http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/irc-log-techrights-11062011.html

TRIdentica/#techrights-[noyesk/@noyesk] The Linux desktop experience is
killing #Linux on the desktop http://bit.ly/kuKmbl	Jun 11 15:55

TechrightsBot-tr	Title: (think) - The Linux desktop experience is
killing Linux on the desktop .::. Size~: 21.04 KB	Jun 11 15:55


...All done manually of course :)

Consider yourself Rope-A-Doped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

I'm beginning to agree with Tom Shelton....
This is just too easy...



-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/

Linux's dismal desktop market share:

http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html 

Desktop Linux on Life Support:

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#32420

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2011-06-12 17:59 -0400
Message-ID<it3cra$m42$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#32407
On 6/12/2011 5:09 PM, flatfish+++ wrote:
> Crybaby Chris Ahlstrom is once again accusing me of cherry picking bad
> Linux posts, as if one has to try hard to find them..hahaha...
>
>
> He posted a new thread entitled :"[Troll] Yet another anti-Linux rant
> cherry-picked by Flounder"
>
> Well Chris Ahlstrom, guess where I got the orginal post entitled:
>
> "The Linux desktop experience is killing Linux on the desktop." ????
>
> Hmmmm, Liarmutt?
>
> RIGHT FROM YOUR FORMER MASTER Roy Schestowitz!!!
>
> http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/irc-log-techrights-11062011.html
>
> TRIdentica/#techrights-[noyesk/@noyesk] The Linux desktop experience is
> killing #Linux on the desktop http://bit.ly/kuKmbl	Jun 11 15:55
>
> TechrightsBot-tr	Title: (think) - The Linux desktop experience is
> killing Linux on the desktop .::. Size~: 21.04 KB	Jun 11 15:55
>
>
> ...All done manually of course :)
>
> Consider yourself Rope-A-Doped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
>
> I'm beginning to agree with Tom Shelton....
> This is just too easy...




Nice little KO, Flattie!

Fact is, it's harder to cherry-pick GOOD Linux posts than bad ones...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32421

Fromflatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
Date2011-06-12 18:01 -0400
Message-ID<1xi0d7q9o5rkx$.d7qazghbrw73.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#32420
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:59:05 -0400, DFS wrote:

> On 6/12/2011 5:09 PM, flatfish+++ wrote:
>> Crybaby Chris Ahlstrom is once again accusing me of cherry picking bad
>> Linux posts, as if one has to try hard to find them..hahaha...
>>
>>
>> He posted a new thread entitled :"[Troll] Yet another anti-Linux rant
>> cherry-picked by Flounder"
>>
>> Well Chris Ahlstrom, guess where I got the orginal post entitled:
>>
>> "The Linux desktop experience is killing Linux on the desktop." ????
>>
>> Hmmmm, Liarmutt?
>>
>> RIGHT FROM YOUR FORMER MASTER Roy Schestowitz!!!
>>
>> http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/irc-log-techrights-11062011.html
>>
>> TRIdentica/#techrights-[noyesk/@noyesk] The Linux desktop experience is
>> killing #Linux on the desktop http://bit.ly/kuKmbl	Jun 11 15:55
>>
>> TechrightsBot-tr	Title: (think) - The Linux desktop experience is
>> killing Linux on the desktop .::. Size~: 21.04 KB	Jun 11 15:55
>>
>>
>> ...All done manually of course :)
>>
>> Consider yourself Rope-A-Doped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
>>
>> I'm beginning to agree with Tom Shelton....
>> This is just too easy...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Nice little KO, Flattie!
> 
> Fact is, it's harder to cherry-pick GOOD Linux posts than bad ones...

Thanks!!!

It's easy to cherry pick GOOD Linux posts though.
Now trying to find Good Linux posts where the freetards aren't LIEing
for LIEnux, is almost impossible.....!

It takes hours to sort through "works for me" lies...

hahaha!




-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/

Linux's dismal desktop market share:

http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html 

Desktop Linux on Life Support:

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32450

FromHadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2011-06-13 05:48 +0200
Message-ID<81fwnemlx0.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#32421
flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> writes:

> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:59:05 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 6/12/2011 5:09 PM, flatfish+++ wrote:
>>> Crybaby Chris Ahlstrom is once again accusing me of cherry picking bad
>>> Linux posts, as if one has to try hard to find them..hahaha...
>>>
>>>
>>> He posted a new thread entitled :"[Troll] Yet another anti-Linux rant
>>> cherry-picked by Flounder"
>>>
>>> Well Chris Ahlstrom, guess where I got the orginal post entitled:
>>>
>>> "The Linux desktop experience is killing Linux on the desktop." ????
>>>
>>> Hmmmm, Liarmutt?
>>>
>>> RIGHT FROM YOUR FORMER MASTER Roy Schestowitz!!!
>>>
>>> http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/irc-log-techrights-11062011.html
>>>
>>> TRIdentica/#techrights-[noyesk/@noyesk] The Linux desktop experience is
>>> killing #Linux on the desktop http://bit.ly/kuKmbl	Jun 11 15:55
>>>
>>> TechrightsBot-tr	Title: (think) - The Linux desktop experience is
>>> killing Linux on the desktop .::. Size~: 21.04 KB	Jun 11 15:55
>>>
>>>
>>> ...All done manually of course :)
>>>
>>> Consider yourself Rope-A-Doped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
>>>
>>> I'm beginning to agree with Tom Shelton....
>>> This is just too easy...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Nice little KO, Flattie!
>> 
>> Fact is, it's harder to cherry-pick GOOD Linux posts than bad ones...
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> It's easy to cherry pick GOOD Linux posts though.
> Now trying to find Good Linux posts where the freetards aren't LIEing
> for LIEnux, is almost impossible.....!
>
> It takes hours to sort through "works for me" lies...
>
> hahaha!

I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts from
me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32458

FromTomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com>
Date2011-06-13 08:27 +0200
Message-ID<20110613082042.451@usenet.drumscum.be>
In reply to#32450
On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>
> I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts from
> me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted.

Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under the
GPL.

Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been
deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo.

Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc
when a user has . on his path.

Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, and
mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - even
in the repositories themselves!

Or when you said that even on GNU/Linux files are executable based on
their extension.

And so on.

Yes, some very good pro Linux and OSS post that can be verified from
you there!

-- 
http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be
Hasta la vista, baby.
	~ T-101

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32468

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Date2011-06-13 10:34 +0100
Message-ID<u52hc8-cna.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org>
In reply to#32458
In reply to TomB who posted:

> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>
>> I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts from
>> me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted.
>
> Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under the
> GPL.
>
> Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been
> deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo.
>
> Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc
> when a user has . on his path.
>
> Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, and
> mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - even
> in the repositories themselves!
>
> Or when you said that even on GNU/Linux files are executable based on
> their extension.
>
> And so on.
>
> Yes, some very good pro Linux and OSS post that can be verified from
> you there!

And how about these "pro-linux & OSS posts" from the trolling M$ zealot:

Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear. 
Too little too late. 
Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@registered.motzarella.org>

A lot of OSS is simply crap. And if it were
"for sale" they would soon go out of business.
Hadron Quack -  Mon, 07 Jan 2008 alt.os.linux.ubuntu

So you think it's tougher for Free (as in beer) SW to replace MS SW? It
doesn't replace the MS stuff generally because the "free" application SW
is piss poor in relation to the purchased versions.
Hadron 
Message-ID: <osbn15-4ce.ln1@news.individual.net>

Anyone who says Open Office is as
good as MS Office is living in denial.
Hadron Quark 
Message-ID: <87wsxqrjmz.fsf@gmail.com>

Who the fuck wants to install OO on a new system for home?
Hadron: <gu0bjt$v96$4@news.motzarella.org>

etc, etc..
-- 
XPN :: http://xpn.altervista.org
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32474 — [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-06-13 06:37 -0400
Subject[Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<it4pcv$fii$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#32468
William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> And how about these "pro-linux & OSS posts" from the trolling M$ zealot:
>
> Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear. 
> Too little too late. 
> Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
> Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@registered.motzarella.org>

I'm trying to figure out where this "boom" is that is getting lowered on me.
All I'm getting is a tickly feeling at getting so much attention from
a trio of mental dwarves.

Get this:  Flounder waits patiently, for who knows how long, to find
someone, at an organization he apparently loaths, saying something that
seems to agree with Flounder's FUD.  He finally finds an off-hand (and, I
believe, sorely misplaced) remark and hurriedly brings it here, where
his/her buddies can lap it up.

And it is supposed to make me feel bad?

-- 
Keep your laws off my body!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32476 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromBig Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com>
Date2011-06-13 06:50 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<YLidnXNU1u7AdmjQnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
In reply to#32474
On 6/13/2011 6:37 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>
> And it is supposed to make me feel bad?
>

He is just a MS using hypocrite making his living with MS just running 
his mouth. He is just a worthless lip-service dog barking. He is not 
even true to the game.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32478 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

Frombbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2011-06-13 12:18 +0100
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<95m9vuFkb1U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#32474
On Monday 13 June 2011 11:37 Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> And how about these "pro-linux & OSS posts" from the trolling M$ zealot:
>>
>> Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear. 
>> Too little too late. 
>> Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
>> Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@registered.motzarella.org>
> 
> I'm trying to figure out where this "boom" is that is getting lowered on 
me.
> All I'm getting is a tickly feeling at getting so much attention from
> a trio of mental dwarves.
> 
> Get this:  Flounder waits patiently, for who knows how long, to find
> someone, at an organization he apparently loaths, saying something that
> seems to agree with Flounder's FUD.  He finally finds an off-hand (and, I
> believe, sorely misplaced) remark and hurriedly brings it here, where
> his/her buddies can lap it up.
> 
> And it is supposed to make me feel bad?

I just don't know!
Perhaps I'm just being dim, but I'm completely lost as to what her OP on 
this thread is all about.
I really would be grateful if somebody could explain that first post to me 
in simple terms - and if (for the sake of brevity) they could omit all the 
usual expletives and obscenities, that would be even better.
TIA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32483 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromHadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2011-06-13 13:41 +0200
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<1qr56yot67.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#32478
bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> writes:

> On Monday 13 June 2011 11:37 Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> And how about these "pro-linux & OSS posts" from the trolling M$ zealot:
>>>
>>> Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear. 
>>> Too little too late. 
>>> Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
>>> Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@registered.motzarella.org>

And your point? Linux desktop share is dropping. This does not in any
way mean I think its unsuitable for certain people. I know it makes you
cry but I use it. Poor Dumb Willy. And it looks like I was correct
because despite the abject failure of Vista and the press time Ubuntu
was getting all that happened was people jumped from DistroNerd to
Ubuntu and many are now leaving that following its buggy, unstable
rushed out of the door releases.

>> 
>> I'm trying to figure out where this "boom" is that is getting lowered on 
> me.
>> All I'm getting is a tickly feeling at getting so much attention from
>> a trio of mental dwarves.

Because you're a dishonest, two faced hypocrite. That should be
abundantly clear. You suck up to liars and frauds like 7. You tell lies
about your Linux usage at work (your OO usage being one). You claim to
be a godlike C programmer yet was unaware dereferencing a null pointer
in C is a no no. You use words like "fuckheads" and "cunts" and are rude
to established FOSS developers like Schilling and deIcaza. I could go
on. You earn your money from closed source Windows SW yet spout on and
on here about how evil proprietary code is and how evil MS are.

So stop playing the poor put upon Linux "advocate".

>> 
>> Get this:  Flounder waits patiently, for who knows how long, to find
>> someone, at an organization he apparently loaths, saying something that
>> seems to agree with Flounder's FUD.  He finally finds an off-hand (and, I
>> believe, sorely misplaced) remark and hurriedly brings it here, where
>> his/her buddies can lap it up.
>> 
>> And it is supposed to make me feel bad?
>
> I just don't know!
> Perhaps I'm just being dim, but I'm completely lost as to what her OP on 
> this thread is all about.
> I really would be grateful if somebody could explain that first post to me 
> in simple terms - and if (for the sake of brevity) they could omit all the 
> usual expletives and obscenities, that would be even better.
> TIA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32505 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

Frombbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2011-06-13 13:41 +0100
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<95mesiFqb3U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#32483
On Monday 13 June 2011 12:41 Hadron wrote:

> bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> 
>> On Monday 13 June 2011 11:37 Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> And how about these "pro-linux & OSS posts" from the trolling M$ 
zealot:
>>>>
>>>> Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear. 
>>>> Too little too late. 
>>>> Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
>>>> Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@registered.motzarella.org>
> 
> And your point? Linux desktop share is dropping. This does not in any
> way mean I think its unsuitable for certain people. I know it makes you
> cry but I use it. Poor Dumb Willy. And it looks like I was correct
> because despite the abject failure of Vista and the press time Ubuntu
> was getting all that happened was people jumped from DistroNerd to
> Ubuntu and many are now leaving that following its buggy, unstable
> rushed out of the door releases.
> 
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to figure out where this "boom" is that is getting lowered on 
>> me.
>>> All I'm getting is a tickly feeling at getting so much attention from
>>> a trio of mental dwarves.
> 
> Because you're a dishonest, two faced hypocrite. That should be
> abundantly clear. You suck up to liars and frauds like 7. You tell lies
> about your Linux usage at work (your OO usage being one). You claim to
> be a godlike C programmer yet was unaware dereferencing a null pointer
> in C is a no no. You use words like "fuckheads" and "cunts" and are rude
> to established FOSS developers like Schilling and deIcaza. I could go
> on. You earn your money from closed source Windows SW yet spout on and
> on here about how evil proprietary code is and how evil MS are.
> 
> So stop playing the poor put upon Linux "advocate".
> 
>>> 
>>> Get this:  Flounder waits patiently, for who knows how long, to find
>>> someone, at an organization he apparently loaths, saying something that
>>> seems to agree with Flounder's FUD.  He finally finds an off-hand (and, 
I
>>> believe, sorely misplaced) remark and hurriedly brings it here, where
>>> his/her buddies can lap it up.
>>> 
>>> And it is supposed to make me feel bad?
>>
>> I just don't know!
>> Perhaps I'm just being dim, but I'm completely lost as to what her OP on 
>> this thread is all about.
>> I really would be grateful if somebody could explain that first post to 
me 
>> in simple terms - and if (for the sake of brevity) they could omit all 
the 
>> usual expletives and obscenities, that would be even better.
>> TIA

Now I'm even more confused :-(
Not only do I still not understand the Original Post that started this 
thread, but when I ask for an explanation, I find hadron replying to 
everything that I did *not* post, while studiously avoiding everything that 
I *did* post!
What *is* going on?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32566 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-06-13 10:18 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<it56d3$775$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#32505
bbgruff wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Monday 13 June 2011 12:41 Hadron wrote:
>> 
>> <lies snipped>
>> 
>> <idiocy snipped >
>
> Now I'm even more confused :-(
> Not only do I still not understand the Original Post that started this 
> thread, but when I ask for an explanation, I find hadron replying to 
> everything that I did *not* post, while studiously avoiding everything that 
> I *did* post!
> What *is* going on?

A lot of repeating of the same old lying, insulting garbage.

"Extreme trolling"  :-D

-- 
Beer & Pretzels -- Breakfast of Champions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32615 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

Fromflatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
Date2011-06-13 12:29 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<1pndnmwsmrn8h.1j4l8r053qtup.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#32483
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:41:04 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> 
>> On Monday 13 June 2011 11:37 Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> And how about these "pro-linux & OSS posts" from the trolling M$ zealot:
>>>>
>>>> Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear. 
>>>> Too little too late. 
>>>> Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
>>>> Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@registered.motzarella.org>
> 
> And your point? Linux desktop share is dropping. This does not in any
> way mean I think its unsuitable for certain people. I know it makes you
> cry but I use it. Poor Dumb Willy. And it looks like I was correct
> because despite the abject failure of Vista and the press time Ubuntu
> was getting all that happened was people jumped from DistroNerd to
> Ubuntu and many are now leaving that following its buggy, unstable
> rushed out of the door releases.
> 
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to figure out where this "boom" is that is getting lowered on 
>> me.
>>> All I'm getting is a tickly feeling at getting so much attention from
>>> a trio of mental dwarves.
> 
> Because you're a dishonest, two faced hypocrite. That should be
> abundantly clear. You suck up to liars and frauds like 7. You tell lies
> about your Linux usage at work (your OO usage being one). You claim to
> be a godlike C programmer yet was unaware dereferencing a null pointer
> in C is a no no. You use words like "fuckheads" and "cunts" and are rude
> to established FOSS developers like Schilling and deIcaza. I could go
> on. You earn your money from closed source Windows SW yet spout on and
> on here about how evil proprietary code is and how evil MS are.
> 
> So stop playing the poor put upon Linux "advocate".

They are all dishonest.
COLA Linux vermin who LIE for LIEnux 24x7.



-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/

Linux's dismal desktop market share:

http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html 

Desktop Linux on Life Support:

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32657 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromChris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com>
Date2011-06-13 18:09 +0000
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<it5jp0$pgg$4@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
In reply to#32615
Am Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:29:49 -0400 schrieb flatfish+++:

> They are all dishonest.
> COLA Linux vermin who LIE for LIEnux 24x7.

Am I too "they all"?
Can you show me where I am dishonest, then?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32678 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-06-13 15:40 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<it5p8d$lch$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#32657
Chris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Am Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:29:49 -0400 schrieb flatfish+++:
>
>> They are all dishonest.
>> COLA Linux vermin who LIE for LIEnux 24x7.
>
> Am I too "they all"?
> Can you show me where I am dishonest, then?

Why worry about it?  They're nasty and they'll say *anything*.

-- 
Whenever I date a guy, I think, is this the man I want my children
to spend their weekends with?
		-- Rita Rudner

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32688 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2011-06-13 14:54 -0500
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<hhqcv69kvutvtn33requ6rc6jrb0m9b795@4ax.com>
In reply to#32678
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Chris wrote:
>
>> mentally-ill troll wrote:
>>
>>> They are all dishonest.
>>> COLA Linux vermin who LIE for LIEnux 24x7.
>>
>> Am I too "they all"?
>> Can you show me where I am dishonest, then?
>
>Why worry about it?  They're nasty and they'll say *anything*.

They are pathological liars, and they get-off on calling decent,
honest people "liars".

Some lying POS calling you a "liar" should result in immediate
plonking.  IMHO, of course.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32689 — Re: [Troll] "chrisv" and liarmutt leg humping each other. one reach around away from a happy ending.

From"Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com>
Date2011-06-13 15:59 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] "chrisv" and liarmutt leg humping each other. one reach around away from a happy ending.
Message-ID<it5q6t$mej$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#32688
stupid dog shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:hhqcv69kvutvtn33requ6rc6jrb0m9b795@4ax.com...
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Chris wrote:
>>
>>> mentally-ill troll wrote:
>>>
>>>> They are all dishonest.
>>>> COLA Linux vermin who LIE for LIEnux 24x7.
>>>
>>> Am I too "they all"?
>>> Can you show me where I am dishonest, then?
>>
>>Why worry about it?  They're nasty and they'll say *anything*.
>
> They are pathological liars, and they get-off on calling decent,
> honest people "liars".
>

SLURP!!!!!  you two sweet hearts done leg humping each other yet?

maybe marti can cum along and give each of you a reach around.

you are such a stupid piece of dog shit turd.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#33033 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromTomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com>
Date2011-06-15 01:27 +0200
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<20110615012712.723@usenet.drumscum.be>
In reply to#32657
On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Chris:
> Am Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:29:49 -0400 schrieb flatfish+++:
>
>> They are all dishonest.  COLA Linux vermin who LIE for LIEnux 24x7.
>
> Am I too "they all"?  Can you show me where I am dishonest, then?

You have said something positive about GNU/Linux ;-)

-- 
http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be
Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates
us from the animals... except the weasel.
	~ Homer J. Simpson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#33035 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2011-06-14 17:00 -0700
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<CA1D4427.9BDC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#33033
TomB stated in post 20110615012712.723@usenet.drumscum.be on 6/14/11 4:27
PM:

> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Chris:
>> Am Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:29:49 -0400 schrieb flatfish+++:
>> 
>>> They are all dishonest.  COLA Linux vermin who LIE for LIEnux 24x7.
>> 
>> Am I too "they all"?  Can you show me where I am dishonest, then?
> 
> You have said something positive about GNU/Linux ;-)

From what I have seen, Chris does not tie himself to the "herd" as much as
you do... and you do a lot less than several others (RonB, chrisv, Chris
Ahlstrom and Peter K. come to mind).


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#32480 — Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Date2011-06-13 12:33 +0100
SubjectRe: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom
Message-ID<469hc8-t8q.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org>
In reply to#32474
In reply to Chris Ahlstrom who posted:

> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> And how about these "pro-linux & OSS posts" from the trolling M$ zealot:
>>
>> Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear. 
>> Too little too late. 
>> Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
>> Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@registered.motzarella.org>
>
> I'm trying to figure out where this "boom" is that is getting lowered on me.
> All I'm getting is a tickly feeling at getting so much attention from
> a trio of mental dwarves.
>
> Get this:  Flounder waits patiently, for who knows how long, to find
> someone, at an organization he apparently loaths, saying something that
> seems to agree with Flounder's FUD.  He finally finds an off-hand (and, I
> believe, sorely misplaced) remark and hurriedly brings it here, where
> his/her buddies can lap it up.
>
> And it is supposed to make me feel bad?

As you said, they're "mental dwarves" & as such aren't worth bothering
about IMO. 

-- 
A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 9  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web