Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #347678 > unrolled thread

I like taking cock up my ass

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  I like taking cock up my ass "7" <idiot@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-03-27 01:51 +0100
    Re: I like taking cock up my ass Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-27 15:31 +0000
      Re: I like taking cock up my ass Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 09:01 -0700
        Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-27 09:21 -0700
          Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani Nobody <nobody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-27 12:25 -0400
          Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-27 12:31 -0400
            Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani Nobody <nobody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-27 12:39 -0400
            Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-27 09:51 -0700
              Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-27 13:04 -0400
                Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-27 10:13 -0700
                  Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-27 18:50 +0000
                  Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 00:55 -0400
                    Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-28 05:57 +0000
          Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-03-27 19:53 -0400
            Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-28 07:23 -0500
          Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-28 01:59 +0200
            Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-28 07:44 -0500
              My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 06:15 -0700
              My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 06:17 -0700
                Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-28 19:33 +0000
                Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-28 23:41 +0200
                  How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 14:52 -0700
                    Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Somebody <somebody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-28 18:01 -0400
                    Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 00:25 +0200
                      Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-28 18:30 -0400
                        Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 00:50 +0200
                          Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Somebody <somebody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-28 18:54 -0400
                            Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-28 21:11 -0400
                              Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 15:38 +0200
                                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 10:09 -0400
                                  Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 19:54 +0200
                                    Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 14:51 -0400
                                      Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 22:04 +0200
                                        Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-29 20:30 +0000
                                        Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 13:59 -0700
                                          Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 23:57 +0200
                                            Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 18:23 -0700
                                        Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 16:50 -0500
                                        Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 19:23 -0400
                                          Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-30 00:42 +0000
                                            Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 10:52 -0400
                                              Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-30 16:26 +0000
                                        Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-29 20:38 -0400
                                          Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-30 06:59 -0500
                                            Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-30 11:46 -0400
                                              Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 11:53 -0400
                                    Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 12:05 -0700
                                  Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 12:06 -0700
                          Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-28 21:10 -0400
                        Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 14:13 -0400
                      Peter Kohlmann has brain damage, I think. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 15:53 -0700
                        Re: Peter Kohlmann has brain damage, I think. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-28 23:32 +0000
                  Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 07:24 -0500
              Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 10:21 -0400
                Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 19:50 +0200
                  Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 13:12 -0500
                  *Spank*  Dumfsck and Kreep chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 14:29 -0500
                    Re: *Spank*  Dumfsck and Kreep owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-29 19:36 +0000
                      Re: *Spank* Dumfsck and Kreep DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 15:42 -0400
                    Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 15:59 -0400
                  Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 10:51 -0400
      Re: I like taking cock up my ass "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 03:01 +0200

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#347678 — I like taking cock up my ass

My name is Joseph Michael.

There is nothing that I like more than a nice hard cock up my ass.

You can cum over and "satisfy" me at

Joseph Michael
23 Portland Rise, 
London N4 2PT
Tel 0836 703945 (Mobile)
Tel 0181-800 9914 Fax 9915

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#347737

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 01:51:25 +0100, 7 wrote:

> 
> There is nothing that I like more than a nice hard cock up my ass.
> 

Sounds like Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple.

It extends to all Apple fans (fags) as well.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Truth is indeed more degenerate than fiction.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347751

On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 12:33:28 AM UTC+9, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 01:51:25 +0100, 7 wrote:
> 
> > 
> > There is nothing that I like more than a nice hard cock up my ass.
> > 
> 
> Sounds like Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple.
> 
> It extends to all Apple fans (fags) as well.
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
> Truth is indeed more degenerate than fiction.

Jeff Relf apparently figured out how to use dizum

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347761 — Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

I drop posts from the following servers:

  Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani

Still, I see all replies to me, no matter who/where from.

My servers are the best:

  http://glorb.com/usenet.php
  http://usenet.blueworldhosting.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347763 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:21:15 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> I drop posts from the following servers:
> 
>   Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani
> 
> Still, I see all replies to me, no matter who/where from.
> 
> My servers are the best:
> 
>   http://glorb.com/usenet.php
>   http://usenet.blueworldhosting.com

alt.mental.health is this way ----->>>>>>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347766 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

On 3/27/2016 12:21 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> I drop posts from the following servers:
>
>    Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani
>
> Still, I see all replies to me, no matter who/where from.
>
> My servers are the best:
>
>    http://glorb.com/usenet.php
>    http://usenet.blueworldhosting.com


I rarely see your posts.

Why am I seeing this one?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347769 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 12:31:00 -0400, DFS wrote:

> On 3/27/2016 12:21 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> I drop posts from the following servers:
>>
>>    Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani
>>
>> Still, I see all replies to me, no matter who/where from.
>>
>> My servers are the best:
>>
>>    http://glorb.com/usenet.php
>>    http://usenet.blueworldhosting.com
> 
> 
> I rarely see your posts.
> 
> Why am I seeing this one?

He is one strange dude.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347772 — Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

You (MrDFS) asked me:
> I rarely see your posts.  Why am I seeing this one?

Eternal-September censors simple markup.
When my "Content-Type:" field, in the header,
is "Text/plain", instead of "Text/HTML", you can see it.

I've been enjoying Usenet much more, since dropping posts from:

  Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347775 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

On 3/27/2016 12:51 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You (MrDFS) asked me:
>> I rarely see your posts.  Why am I seeing this one?
>
> Eternal-September censors simple markup.
> When my "Content-Type:" field, in the header,
> is "Text/plain", instead of "Text/HTML", you can see it.
>
> I've been enjoying Usenet much more, since dropping posts from:
>
>    Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani


Why are you posting HTML to a plain-text medium in the first place?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347779 — Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.

You (MrDFS) asked me:
> Why are you posting HTML to a plain-text medium in the first place?

Usenet, like eMail, is a text; HTML is text.

Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.
<PRE> allows for a FixedWidth font and userControlled whiteSpace.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347789 — Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:13:08 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> You (MrDFS) asked me:
>> Why are you posting HTML to a plain-text medium in the first place?
> 
> Usenet, like eMail, is a text; HTML is text.
> 
> Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.
> <PRE> allows for a FixedWidth font and userControlled whiteSpace.

#LyX 2.0 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 413
\begin_document
\begin_header
\textclass article
\use_default_options true
\maintain_unincluded_children false
\language english
\language_package default
\inputencoding auto
\fontencoding global
\font_roman default
\font_sans default
\font_typewriter default
\font_default_family default
\use_non_tex_fonts false
\font_sc false
\font_osf false
\font_sf_scale 100
\font_tt_scale 100

\graphics default
\default_output_format default
\output_sync 0
\bibtex_command default
\index_command default
\paperfontsize default
\use_hyperref false
\papersize default
\use_geometry false
\use_amsmath 1
\use_esint 1
\use_mhchem 1
\use_mathdots 1
\cite_engine basic
\use_bibtopic false
\use_indices false
\paperorientation portrait
\suppress_date false
\use_refstyle 1
\index Index
\shortcut idx
\color #008000
\end_index
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\paragraph_indentation default
\quotes_language english
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\tracking_changes false
\output_changes false
\html_math_output 0
\html_css_as_file 0
\html_be_strict false
\end_header

\begin_body

\begin_layout Standard
Dear Mr.
 Jeff,
\end_layout

\begin_layout Standard
It has been brought to our attention that you have confused markup 
languages
 with plain text.
\end_layout

\begin_layout Standard
Please change your ways.
\end_layout

\begin_layout Standard
(Signed)
\end_layout

\begin_layout Standard
Another Markup Language
\end_layout

\end_body
\end_document


-- 
 -v
Kernel:4.6.0-rc1-sd  Desktop:Xfce 4.12.2  Distro:Linux Mint 17.3 Rosa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347822 — Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.

On 03/27/2016 01:13 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You (MrDFS) asked me:
>> Why are you posting HTML to a plain-text medium in the first place?
>
> Usenet, like eMail, is a text; HTML is text.
>
> Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.
> <PRE> allows for a FixedWidth font and userControlled whiteSpace.

Answer: Rolf is an idiot

Comment: Just be glad he's no longer posting HTML with a dark red font 
on a brown background.



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347863 — Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.

In sci.physics benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/27/2016 01:13 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> You (MrDFS) asked me:
>>> Why are you posting HTML to a plain-text medium in the first place?
>>
>> Usenet, like eMail, is a text; HTML is text.
>>
>> Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>.
>> <PRE> allows for a FixedWidth font and userControlled whiteSpace.
> 
> Answer: Rolf is an idiot
> 
> Comment: Just be glad he's no longer posting HTML with a dark red font 
> on a brown background.
 
Doesn't matter to me; I use a real news server that dumps his shit so most
of his inane posts are never seen.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347805 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:21:15 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> I drop posts from the following servers: ...

Sorry, can't help you with that problem. Cheers, -- tlvp

FU: news.software.readers dropped from distribution list.
-- 
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347830 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

tlvp wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:21:15 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

*plonk*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347806 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

 wrote:

> I drop posts from the following servers:
> 
>   Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani
> 
> Still, I see all replies to me, no matter who/where from.
> 
> My servers are the best:

Idiot

If you are dropping posts from a number of servers, you will not see them if 
your software is working correctly

Except your "drop mechanism" is programmed by you. Then it will work like 
the rest of your dimbulbs software: Not like anything expected

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347831 — Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> wrote:
>> 
>> My servers are the best:
>
> Idiot

Heh.  Reminds me of when Relf claimed that his code was the "finest
you'll ever see".  Yeah, right.

-- 
"Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not compile-time
warnings."  -  Jeff Relf (the trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" supports
Relf, on this issue)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347832 — My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.

MrChrisV wrote:
> Relf claimed that his code was the "finest you'll ever see".

No.  I'd never say such a thing !
My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.

> "Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not compile-time
> warnings."  -  Jeff Relf (the trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" supports
> Relf, on this issue)

Disabling certain warnings is best, I've found.
Sometime I want unreference variables, for example, just because.
I'm using my code, so I know that it works the way I want.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347833 — My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.

MrChrisV wrote:
> Relf claimed that his code was the "finest you'll ever see".

No.  I'd never say such a thing !
My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.

> "Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not compile-time
> warnings."  -  Jeff Relf (the trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" supports
> Relf, on this issue)

Disabling certain warnings is best, I've found.
Sometimes I want unreferenced variables, for example, just because.
I'm using my code, so I know that it works the way I want.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#347866 — Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> MrChrisV wrote:
>> Relf claimed that his code was the "finest you'll ever see".
> 
> No.  I'd never say such a thing !
> My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.
> 
>> "Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not compile-time
>> warnings."  -  Jeff Relf (the trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" supports
>> Relf, on this issue)
> 
> Disabling certain warnings is best, I've found.
> Sometimes I want unreferenced variables, for example, just because.
> I'm using my code, so I know that it works the way I want.

Apparently you wanted it to post the same message twice.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web