Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #161934 > unrolled thread
| Started by | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-02-01 20:44 -0500 |
| Last post | 2013-02-03 13:29 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 253 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-01 20:44 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Tralfaz <directly_above_the_center_of_the_earth@santas_deer_poop_too_much.org> - 2013-02-02 14:18 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2013-02-02 16:10 +0100
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 10:14 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 15:42 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-02-02 15:32 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 15:43 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-02-02 15:55 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 16:12 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Chris Ahlstrom <admin@cyberbully.com> - 2013-02-02 13:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-03 17:21 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 09:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-03 17:22 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 17:38 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 09:40 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 09:41 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 11:49 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 17:34 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 11:40 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 18:42 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 12:41 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-02-02 20:59 +0100
Android is just as much Linux based as OSX is BSD based. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-02 12:43 -0800
Re: Android is just as much Linux based as OSX is BSD based.  owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-02-02 21:11 +0000
I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-02 15:33 -0800
Re: I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh. cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-02-03 04:10 +0000
Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-02 20:59 -0800
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 08:44 +0000
Usenet has been a better use of my time than 40k would've been. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-03 01:06 -0800
Re: Usenet has been a better use of my time than 40k would've been. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 09:25 +0000
I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-03 01:52 -0800
Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 10:06 +0000
Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-02-03 11:45 +0000
Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. §ñühwö£f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> - 2013-02-03 09:58 -0700
Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-02-04 01:11 +0000
Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. §ñühwö£f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> - 2013-02-05 09:52 -0700
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:49 -0800
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 10:38 +0000
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-03 02:56 -0800
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> - 2013-02-03 23:34 +0000
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-03 19:48 +0000
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? There's Howard Hughes in China Blue Suede Shoes <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:34 -0800
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-02-03 20:44 +0000
It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-03 13:39 -0800
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) There's Howard Hughes in China Blue Suede Shoes <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 13:47 -0800
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-04 07:43 -0600
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) �»¿ snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-04 18:16 +0000
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) There's Howard Hughes in China Blue Suede Shoes <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-04 10:32 -0800
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) �»¿ snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-04 19:21 +0000
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) midjet <news@gallaxial.com> - 2013-02-04 22:26 -0500
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) terrable <terrable@terrable.net> - 2013-02-04 20:12 +0000
"chrisv" is stranger than your average bear. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-04 11:40 -0800
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-04 13:38 -0700
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) ?? coder <autom@ted.paranoia.feed> - 2013-02-04 20:56 +0000
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-04 15:39 -0600
Murphy gets plonked by chrisv a third time; film at 11 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-04 17:55 -0500
Re: Murphy gets plonked by chrisv a third time; film at 11 Chris Ahlstrom <admin@cyberbully.com> - 2013-02-05 06:02 -0500
Re: Murphy gets plonked by chrisv a third time; film at 11 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-05 07:03 -0600
I got three k00ks, got any shills? Chris Ahlstrom <admin@cyberbully.com> - 2013-02-05 08:10 -0500
Re: I got three k00ks, got any shills? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-05 07:56 -0600
Re: I got three k00ks, got any shills? Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2013-02-05 23:35 +0000
Re: I got three k00ks, got any shills? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-05 20:41 -0700
Re: I got three k00ks, got any shills? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-09 10:41 -0500
Re: I got three k00ks, got any shills? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-05 12:28 -0500
Re: Murphy gets plonked by chrisv a third time; film at 11 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-05 06:16 -0600
Re: Murphy gets plonked by chrisv a third time; film at 11 snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-05 13:03 +0000
Re: Murphy gets plonked by chrisv a third time; film at 11 GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-05 11:30 -0700
Re: Murphy gets plonked by chrisv a third time; film at 11 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 16:27 -0500
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) ?? coder <autom@ted.paranoia.feed> - 2013-02-04 23:20 +0000
Re: It's "you", not "yu". (ha ha) ?? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-04 20:13 -0700
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-03 20:50 +0000
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? There's Howard Hughes in China Blue Suede Shoes <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 13:03 -0800
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-04 06:19 +0000
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-04 07:43 -0600
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> - 2013-02-04 13:55 +0000
Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. ?? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-04 18:18 -0500
Re: I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-02-03 12:11 -0500
Re: I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-03 16:07 -0500
Re: SECONDED: Greg Hall and Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award (was Re: I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh. ) kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-06 21:05 -0500
Annoying .GIF animation. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-02-06 19:05 -0800
Re: Annoying .GIF animation. Brad Guth <bradguth@gmail.com> - 2013-02-06 21:22 -0800
Re: Annoying .GIF animation. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-02-07 11:20 -0500
Re: Annoying .GIF animation. Brad Guth <bradguth@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 14:58 -0800
Re: Annoying .GIF animation. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-02-07 18:03 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 15:04 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 22:13 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 18:06 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 20:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:17 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:26 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 08:53 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 12:06 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 14:24 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 13:06 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 15:11 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 13:31 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 15:38 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 16:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 19:06 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 20:33 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:14 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:32 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:13 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 23:21 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:16 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:31 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-02-03 19:54 +0100
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 14:13 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 12:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 14:52 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Crabbit Bampot <crabbit.bampot@gmail.com> - 2013-02-02 17:13 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 17:29 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 11:40 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 18:44 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Crabbit Bampot <crabbit.bampot@gmail.com> - 2013-02-02 19:01 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 19:35 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 13:03 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:19 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-02-02 22:06 +0100
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 21:40 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 22:19 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 18:18 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:21 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:18 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:20 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 20:23 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:21 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:21 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:35 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:19 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:34 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 12:43 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 14:53 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:22 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 23:26 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:22 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:21 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-02-02 21:12 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 22:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-02-02 22:43 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-04 07:58 -0600
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-04 07:36 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-04 10:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-03 17:22 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 22:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 16:05 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-02-03 23:02 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Chris Ahlstrom <admin@cyberbully.com> - 2013-02-04 06:13 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-05 18:27 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 17:37 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 22:39 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 16:06 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 18:10 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 20:09 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 05:44 +0100
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-04 10:47 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:27 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 23:33 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:28 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:27 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:24 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 23:26 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:36 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 15:09 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 22:17 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:30 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:28 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 23:35 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:38 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:33 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 12:56 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:32 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:31 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:37 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-02-02 22:40 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2013-02-03 03:37 +0100
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 15:08 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-02 15:07 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 22:16 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:38 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:46 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 12:52 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:30 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 23:36 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 18:18 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 23:25 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 20:02 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:24 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:03 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 18:26 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:31 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:16 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 08:37 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-05 14:47 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:46 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:44 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 12:18 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 16:33 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 20:10 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 21:05 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-04 11:01 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-04 12:20 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-04 13:40 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-04 13:55 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-04 20:20 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-04 20:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 17:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:05 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 18:21 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 18:36 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-02 20:07 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 01:09 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-03 17:22 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 22:27 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-02-03 17:28 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 22:31 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 16:09 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 18:13 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 23:14 +0000
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-04 11:02 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 16:09 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-02 20:23 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 10:47 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 12:51 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 12:12 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 14:30 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 12:47 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 14:58 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 16:43 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 19:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 20:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 12:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 12:15 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-02-03 13:01 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 13:10 -0700
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-03 15:22 -0500
Re: Why Linux Still Sucks... From A Linux Zealot. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-02-03 13:29 -0700
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-02 12:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CD32B9E4.14012%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #162002 |
On 2/2/13 11:42 AM, in article w6dPs.5486$aY1.1977@fx31.fr7, "Goblin" <bytes4free@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 02/02/13 18:40, GreyCloud wrote: >> >> No, not Microsoft Advocates, just sane people. > > I'll quote that.... > > So where are the "sane" people when it comes to buying Windows phone.... > Oh, they are all buying Apple and Android products.... People buy what they think will work best for them - considering cost, etc. On the desktop this is generally Windows and sometimes Macs... with Macs getting the highest user satisfaction ratings. On phones this is generally Samsung or Apple devices... with the Apple devices getting the highest user satisfaction ratings. On tablets this is generally the iPad (or mini version) or an Android / similar device - with the Apple devices getting the highest user satisfaction ratings. Microsoft does well in one area. Android / Linux does well in two of the areas. Apple does well in all three... but Apple has to be careful - their customer satisfaction scores are reportedly slipping. And they need to show their promised Pro hardware pretty soon... and show that they can have iOS and OS X keep up the level of innovation they used to show but has been slowing down some. Apple does well - but consumers owe them nothing. If they do not keep innovating and working to make their products better than they *will* stop earning the highest user satisfaction ratings. Jobs was fanatical about high quality... and even under him there were lots of errors (happens to anyone willing to take risks). Without him will Apple keep up the same levels of quality? Will the new shake-up in the management "fix" things? Will others show the same level of innovation and focus on excellence and catch up to Apple... in many ways from what I have seen Android already has. The next few years will be interesting to watch in the tech world. -- "It is often hard to persuade the developers of one component to do what improves the system as a whole rather than what will make their own component more useful and successful." -- Richard Stallman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-02 20:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <510d6fd9$0$11997$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org> |
| In reply to | #162002 |
Goblin wrote: > On 02/02/13 18:40, GreyCloud wrote: >> >> No, not Microsoft Advocates, just sane people. > > I'll quote that.... > > So where are the "sane" people when it comes to buying Windows > phone.... Oh, they are all buying Apple and Android products.... What are you blabbering about, Goobler? Phones? b.t.w. sMarti's friend says that Android is not Linux! http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.nl/2011/07/six-signs-android-really-isnt-linux.html -- Major Linux Problems on the Desktop or Why Linux is not (yet) Ready for the Desktop, 2013 edition http://bit.ly/gBOiz6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-02 12:43 -0800 |
| Subject | Android is just as much Linux based as OSX is BSD based. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2{0.43.PM.Seattle.2013}> |
| In reply to | #162015 |
<style> :not(:link):not(:visited){color:rgb(255,111,111)} :link{color:rgb(155,155,155)} :visited{color:rgb(155,155,0)} </style> <body bgcolor=black style='margin: 0'><pre style='color: rgb(255,111,111); padding:0 1em 1em 1em; font-size: 15px; font-family: DejaVu Sans Mono, Lucida Console, monospace, MS Mincho; background: black;'>
Quoting Cola⋅Zealot's link,
http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.nl/2011/07/six-signs-android-really-isnt-linux.html
Android applications are all java based,
meaning you need an emulator like ＜Alien Dalvik＞
to get them to run on other platforms.
...
＜Up to 15$ per Android handset sold is going to Microsoft＞
...
You know what is fairly unique to Android though ?
Claiming to be open source and then only releasing your
source code to a select few hardware makers.
...
Android is just as much Linux based as OSX is BSD based.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-02 21:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Android is just as much Linux based as OSX is BSD based.  |
| Message-ID | <enf93a.9a38lar@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #162022 |
Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote: > [-- text/html, encoding 8bit, charset: UTF-8, 15 lines --] You should try writing a news client that actually works.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-02 15:33 -0800 |
| Subject | I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2{3.33.PM.Seattle.2013}> |
| In reply to | #162027 |
<style> :not(:link):not(:visited){color:rgb(255,111,111)} :link{color:rgb(155,155,155)} :visited{color:rgb(155,155,0)} </style> <body bgcolor=black style='margin: 0'><pre style='color: rgb(255,111,111); padding:0 1em 1em 1em; font-size: 15px; font-family: DejaVu Sans Mono, Lucida Console, monospace, MS Mincho; background: black;'>
I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh.
I'm worried about the 99 percent; gMail, Yahoo, Hotmail,
Windows Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and kiosk users, for example.
Without the <PRE> tag, HTML, my posts would be wrapped
and the font wouldn't be monospaced.
When people see my emails and posts, with this console⋅like theme,
they know it's me. I stand out.
Ray Banana, Eternal September's admin, censors my posts.
He wants to banish HTML from Usenet; but it's backfiring on him.
I'm in a lot of threads these days, people KNOW E⋅S fails.
Besides me, only a few WebTV users, little old ladies, post HTML.
⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅
Regular Posters of <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM" style='color:rgb(155,155,155)' target=_blank>Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy</A> and <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Phy_Regs.HTM" style='color:rgb(155,155,155)' target=_blank>Sci.Physics</A>.
<img Src="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.Cola.PNG" Alt="Regular Posters of Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy">
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 04:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh. |
| Message-ID | <6ahdhh.ukl.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #162069 |
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:33:13 -0800, Jeff-Relf.Me Inscribed upon the Golden
Tablets of Usenet thusly:
> <style> :not(:link):not(:visited){color:rgb(255,111,111)}
> :link{color:rgb(155,155,155)} :visited{color:rgb(155,155,0)} </style>
> <body bgcolor=black style='margin: 0'><pre style='color:
> rgb(255,111,111); padding:0 1em 1em 1em; font-size: 15px; font-family:
> DejaVu Sans Mono, Lucida Console, monospace, MS Mincho; background:
> black;'>
> I'm NOT worried about tin/slrn users, duh.
>
> I'm worried about the 99 percent; gMail, Yahoo, Hotmail,
> Windows Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and kiosk users, for example.
>
> Without the <PRE> tag, HTML, my posts would be wrapped and the font
> wouldn't be monospaced.
>
> When people see my emails and posts, with this console⋅like theme,
> they know it's me. I stand out.
>
> Ray Banana, Eternal September's admin, censors my posts.
> He wants to banish HTML from Usenet; but it's backfiring on him.
> I'm in a lot of threads these days, people KNOW E⋅S fails.
>
> Besides me, only a few WebTV users, little old ladies, post HTML.
> ⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅
> Regular Posters of <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM"
> style='color:rgb(155,155,155)'
> target=_blank>Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy</A> and <A
> hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Phy_Regs.HTM" style='color:rgb(155,155,155)'
> target=_blank>Sci.Physics</A>.
>
> <img Src="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.Cola.PNG" Alt="Regular Posters of
> Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy">
Are you OK? Really man, take a break or something, this isn't healthy
and isn't doing you any good...
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
)\ ( ) /( Cipher/Proud Member, Netscum Alumni Association
)-(0^^0)-( Bungmunch U./AHM Memorial Institute of F@x0r1n6/Dean
)/ \\// \( Colonel/1st Virginia Volunteers/CeSium Brigade
(oo) Registered Linux User #556617
/ ~~ \ Empire of APDD/#6-5p07/VLNOC Cohort #1407
o@o o@o Keeper of the alt.CeSium FAQ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-02 20:59 -0800 |
| Subject | Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.2{8.59.PM.Seattle.2013}> |
| In reply to | #162134 |
What's "not healthy", Mr. "cipher" ? I'm a long time MicroSoft coder / Usenet participant... so what ? Should I be more like Mr. "Gobin" and play roll⋅paying games ? Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 08:44 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. |
| Message-ID | <srpPs.1737$5R.1566@fx02.fr7> |
| In reply to | #162137 |
On 03/02/13 04:59, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Should I be more like Mr. "Gobin" and play roll⋅paying games ? > Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. I dont know.... I'd suggest you learn to spell "role" before trying to play "Role Play" games though. I'd also suggest you actually check out what Warhammer 40k is, it's no more a roleplay game than Command and Conquer - difference being its on a board and you usually paint and build the troops yourself. It's also a great way for my young lad to improve his mathematics (with dice roles etc) and something which he really enjoys playing. Got a problem with that Jeff? Don't think its a good idea? Oh and how are you reading my posts to know I play the game? I thought you had me "plonked"? You a liar? -- Basement Dwellers! - http://openbytes.wordpress.com "From Warhammer to GNU/Linux and back again!" Catch me in #techrights on freenode.net BytesMedia: www.bytesmedia.co.uk Email: bytes4free@googlemail.com Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/114824920343832764896/posts Identi.ca: identi.ca/openbytes Twitter: twitter.com/_goblin Skype: tim.openbytes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 01:06 -0800 |
| Subject | Usenet has been a better use of my time than 40k would've been. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.3{1.06.AM.Seattle.2013}> |
| In reply to | #162146 |
When you (Goblin) first replied to my post, 7jiPs.3999$vz.1823@fx25.fr7, you mentioned "Grey Knight Terminator", a WarHammer 40k character. That's how I knew; I Googled it. It's "Halberd", by the way, not "Halbard". Usenet has been a better use of my time than 40k would've been, I think, because it taught me email/communication skills. If I had a son, I'd teach him programming too, not 40k.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 09:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Usenet has been a better use of my time than 40k would've been. |
| Message-ID | <m2qPs.27726$oI.15559@fx01.fr7> |
| In reply to | #162147 |
On 03/02/13 09:06, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > When you (Goblin) first replied to my post,7jiPs.3999$vz.1823@fx25.fr7, > you mentioned "Grey Knight Terminator", a WarHammer 40k character. > That's how I knew; I Googled it. Didn't ask that.... I thought you were not reading my posts (as per your proud proclamation over on comp.os.linux.advocacy) I get it, that large list of all the people you claim to not read - You don't read the posts, unless you do and reply to them. Got it. > Usenet has been a better use of my time than 40k would've been, > I think, because it taught me email/communication skills. Having read your "work" really? Ok. Email skills? yep there's a plethora of them to have over on Usenet. Communication? Yep, I've read your posts (although this is the first time I think I've ever even tried talking to you).... That's communication is it? And you've been learning from your efforts? Ok. > > If I had a son, I'd teach him programming too, not 40k. Yep, you could give him a rich and fulfilling life by teaching him all the communication you have picked up from Usenet. 4 and a half is a little young to be learning to program, a game that doesn't involve sitting in front of a computer by himself and teaches mathematics as well as decision making is a far better way of learning. But then what would you know? You don't have a son, just your communication skills from using "cool" Usenet. Best of luck to you. -- Basement Dwellers! - http://openbytes.wordpress.com "From Warhammer to GNU/Linux and back again!" Catch me in #techrights on freenode.net BytesMedia: www.bytesmedia.co.uk Email: bytes4free@googlemail.com Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/114824920343832764896/posts Identi.ca: identi.ca/openbytes Twitter: twitter.com/_goblin Skype: tim.openbytes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 01:52 -0800 |
| Subject | I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.3{1.52.AM.Seattle.2013}> |
| In reply to | #162149 |
Usenet is very much like email; so, yes, I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. Before Usenet, my English skill were far worse. eMail is vital to my work ( as a coder and a manager ), it's uber essential, seriously. You (Goblin) sound angry, never a good sign. As I you should've surmised by now: I read ALL replies to me, and I might reply to ANYONE. When "Plonked" nyms aren't replying to me, their posts are marked "Was⋅Read", initially.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 10:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. |
| Message-ID | <xEqPs.37249$dc4.16245@fx09.fr7> |
| In reply to | #162151 |
On 03/02/13 09:52, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > You (Goblin) sound angry, never a good sign. > As I you should've surmised by now: Angry? I don't think so..... care to check back on any of my posts? It's not me trying to cheapen someone's hobby (like you did with Warhammer). Nice new topic though to distract from the truth of what you now accuse me of? Anger? Why not go back to the original topic where our discussion was... The one entitled: "Re: Usenet has been a better use of my time than 40k would've been." Why would you want to deflect the conversation away from there? -- Basement Dwellers! - http://openbytes.wordpress.com "From Warhammer to GNU/Linux and back again!" Catch me in #techrights on freenode.net BytesMedia: www.bytesmedia.co.uk Email: bytes4free@googlemail.com Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/114824920343832764896/posts Identi.ca: identi.ca/openbytes Twitter: twitter.com/_goblin Skype: tim.openbytes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 11:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. |
| Message-ID | <6ai85t.oj9.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #162151 |
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:52:15 -0800, Jeff-Relf.Me Inscribed upon the Golden
Tablets of Usenet thusly:
> Usenet is very much like email;
No, it is not. not even close...
> so, yes, I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. Before Usenet, my
> English skill were far worse.
This explains much...
> eMail is vital to my work ( as a coder and a manager ),
> it's uber essential, seriously.
*uber?* Really? Are you stuck in some 90's time warp and haven't
received the memo on what today's "cool word or phrase to use to make one
sound hip" yet?
Plain talk never goes out of fashion, is always understood...
> You (Goblin) sound angry, never a good sign.
> As I you should've surmised by now:
>
> I read ALL replies to me, and I might reply to ANYONE.
> When "Plonked" nyms aren't replying to me,
> their posts are marked "Was⋅Read", initially.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
)\ ( ) /( Cipher/Proud Member, Netscum Alumni Association
)-(0^^0)-( Bungmunch U./AHM Memorial Institute of F@x0r1n6/Dean
)/ \\// \( Colonel/1st Virginia Volunteers/CeSium Brigade
(oo) Registered Linux User #556617
/ ~~ \ Empire of APDD/#6-5p07/VLNOC Cohort #1407
o@o o@o Keeper of the alt.CeSium FAQ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | §ñühwö£f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 09:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. |
| Message-ID | <kem52v$c7u$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #162177 |
cipher wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:52:15 -0800, Jeff-Relf.Me Inscribed upon the Golden
> Tablets of Usenet thusly:
>
>> Usenet is very much like email;
>
> No, it is not. not even close...
>
>> so, yes, I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. Before Usenet, my
>> English skill were far worse.
>
> This explains much...
>
>> eMail is vital to my work ( as a coder and a manager ),
>> it's uber essential, seriously.
>
> *uber?* Really? Are you stuck in some 90's time warp and haven't
> received the memo on what today's "cool word or phrase to use to make one
> sound hip" yet?
>
> Plain talk never goes out of fashion, is always understood...
>
>> You (Goblin) sound angry, never a good sign.
>> As I you should've surmised by now:
>>
>> I read ALL replies to me, and I might reply to ANYONE.
>> When "Plonked" nyms aren't replying to me,
>> their posts are marked "Was⋅Read", initially.
>
>
No who else never goes out of fashion?
YUOR MOM!
:)
--
http://signon.org/sign/protect-americas-wolves
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-04 01:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. |
| Message-ID | <6ajncl.nn2.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #162258 |
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:58:42 -0700, §ñühwö£f Inscribed upon the Golden
Tablets of Usenet thusly:
> cipher wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:52:15 -0800, Jeff-Relf.Me Inscribed upon the
>> Golden Tablets of Usenet thusly:
>>
>>> Usenet is very much like email;
>>
>> No, it is not. not even close...
>>
>>> so, yes, I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. Before Usenet, my
>>> English skill were far worse.
>>
>> This explains much...
>>
>>> eMail is vital to my work ( as a coder and a manager ),
>>> it's uber essential, seriously.
>>
>> *uber?* Really? Are you stuck in some 90's time warp and haven't
>> received the memo on what today's "cool word or phrase to use to make
>> one sound hip" yet?
>>
>> Plain talk never goes out of fashion, is always understood...
>>
>>> You (Goblin) sound angry, never a good sign.
>>> As I you should've surmised by now:
>>>
>>> I read ALL replies to me, and I might reply to ANYONE.
>>> When "Plonked" nyms aren't replying to me,
>>> their posts are marked "Was⋅Read", initially.
>>
>>
> No who else never goes out of fashion?
>
> YUOR MOM!
>
> :)
Yawn...
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
)\ ( ) /( Cipher/Proud Member, Netscum Alumni Association
)-(0^^0)-( Bungmunch U./AHM Memorial Institute of F@x0r1n6/Dean
)/ \\// \( Colonel/1st Virginia Volunteers/CeSium Brigade
(oo) Registered Linux User #556617
/ ~~ \ Empire of APDD/#6-5p07/VLNOC Cohort #1407
o@o o@o Keeper of the alt.CeSium FAQ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | §ñühwö£f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-05 09:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. |
| Message-ID | <kerdff$ldc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #162504 |
cipher wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:58:42 -0700, §ñühwö£f Inscribed upon the Golden
> Tablets of Usenet thusly:
>
>> cipher wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:52:15 -0800, Jeff-Relf.Me Inscribed upon the
>>> Golden Tablets of Usenet thusly:
>>>
>>>> Usenet is very much like email;
>>> No, it is not. not even close...
>>>
>>>> so, yes, I've learned "email" skills here on Usenet. Before Usenet, my
>>>> English skill were far worse.
>>> This explains much...
>>>
>>>> eMail is vital to my work ( as a coder and a manager ),
>>>> it's uber essential, seriously.
>>> *uber?* Really? Are you stuck in some 90's time warp and haven't
>>> received the memo on what today's "cool word or phrase to use to make
>>> one sound hip" yet?
>>>
>>> Plain talk never goes out of fashion, is always understood...
>>>
>>>> You (Goblin) sound angry, never a good sign.
>>>> As I you should've surmised by now:
>>>>
>>>> I read ALL replies to me, and I might reply to ANYONE.
>>>> When "Plonked" nyms aren't replying to me,
>>>> their posts are marked "Was⋅Read", initially.
>>>
>> No who else never goes out of fashion?
>>
>> YUOR MOM!
>>
>> :)
>
> Yawn...
>
>
>
NURSE! 500ml of latte, stat!
--
http://signon.org/sign/protect-americas-wolves
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 01:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. |
| Message-ID | <09e82da5-f9b9-4374-8ab7-45cf3a213522@9g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #162146 |
On Feb 3, 8:44 am, Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 03/02/13 04:59, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > Should I be more like Mr. "Gobin" and play roll⋅paying games ? > > Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. > > I dont know.... I'd suggest you learn to spell "role" before trying to > play "Role Play" games though. Not to mention "playing". > It's also a great way for my young lad to improve his mathematics (with > dice roles etc) and something which he really enjoys playing. I don't know.... I'd suggest you learn to spell "roll" before trying to play dice games though. <cackle>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 10:38 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. |
| Message-ID | <P6rPs.25985$gt5.16366@fx11.fr7> |
| In reply to | #162150 |
On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote: > Not to mention "playing". Didn't notice the "paying"...... I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not. Are you into "roll paying" games? You'll incur the wrath of the might jeff there too.... of course Jeff's communication and email skills don't stretch to finding out what it is he is trying to cheapen - which is certainly not role-play - "paying" "rolling" or otherwise. -- Basement Dwellers! - http://openbytes.wordpress.com "From Warhammer to GNU/Linux and back again!" Catch me in #techrights on freenode.net BytesMedia: www.bytesmedia.co.uk Email: bytes4free@googlemail.com Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/114824920343832764896/posts Identi.ca: identi.ca/openbytes Twitter: twitter.com/_goblin Skype: tim.openbytes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 02:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. |
| Message-ID | <730fed8d-1133-447f-888e-2fdb0dc020d8@4g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #162161 |
On Feb 3, 10:38 am, Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote: > > > Not to mention "playing". > > Didn't notice the "paying"...... > > I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list > of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not. Oooh, I'm positively quaking in my boots!!!1!1one <cackle>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-03 23:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. |
| Message-ID | <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad> |
| In reply to | #162161 |
Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> wrote: >On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote: >> Not to mention "playing". > >Didn't notice the "paying"...... > heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend. >I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list >of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not. > no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning" is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned". >Are you into "roll paying" games? > You are not aware of the half of it, that much is obvious. Wilson/Kensi/Nadegda/Phoenix are all the four arms of the Bodhisattva that would be the comptroller of alt.usenet.kooks and/or any other newsgroup one Paul G Derbyshire gets booted from - shunned if you like. pffft. >You'll incur the wrath of the might >jeff there too.... of course Jeff's communication and email skills don't >stretch to finding out what it is he is trying to cheapen - which is >certainly not role-play - "paying" "rolling" or otherwise. > I deny your "trying" statement to call it "perseveres in", no less a performance akin to Monty Python's Black Knight. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Knight_(Monty_Python) Assuming you too (in a cast of hundreds) are not another cavitation in the wake of the troll, the news Relf has been trolled (successfully) by the aforementioned Derbyshire long into the mists of time - the first instance of which I have found is here <Jeff_Relf_2005_Feb_26_x5dS @Cotse.NET> with an update requested here; <399Os.83102$532.27708 @newsfe03.iad> ... may well bring a wry grin to your evening read? Put in the light of like attributes (shared by both trollers) your sense of the ridiculous being hilarious may strengthen? ^Both hold a depth of despise for CLI, not universally shared. That chagrin displayed ably in their insistence on changing Usenet interfaces to fit the all dancing all singing GUI "dumbed down" environment they both leech offn. ^Both believe they are accomplished code writers, unpublished. That small anomaly in their lives being excused internally by their belief they are as yet undiscovered geniuses! haw haw. ^Both are sexually amorphous, although Derbyshire does display an effeminate outlook, reflected in his choice to run female personas as a preference. It could be concluded Derbyshire would engage with a male IF he could find a body which would accept his weirdo ideologies. ^Both are completely immersed in themselves, to the point there is no Life beyond the frame of that GUI stared at 24/7. Luckily for Usenet this facet is their undoing as the shared experiences of many owning differing POV truly bring them frothing to the keyboard. ^Both are bottom of the barrel losers, living wholly sustained on handouts. Whilst not an uncommon feature of many Usenet publicists today it is rare to find others so dedicated in bringing turmoil as personal satisfaction, all the while losing, bigtime. There is however one singe significant difference. Relf is relatively harmless, a dribbling baboon whose work is easily deleted, Derbyshire, not so. Paul G D has a bent... one that is maybe dangerous to the unwary, revenge. Two factors which are absolutes for Paul G D. 1. His posts will always challenge, in a defense mode. 2. His posting techniques are all stolen, he copies and uses what he sees as having "worked". The most recent foray is to entrap the innocent as a means to silencing those critics. The method is simple, done before, successfully. 1. A post is made owning content which may inflame someone outside of Usenet. 2. The post - through a campaign of "s/h/e done it" - is attributed to the target. 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed. Using that same mix of odds which makes the Nigerian scam so successful there is a very good chance of a someone bringing litigation, not against Derbyshire the instigator but against his target. The purpose of which is only to incur financial burdens on the target. (one admission is here - <kemhvc$9p1$2 @news.albasani.net> with both Wilson/kensi sox "at it") Derbyshire's most recent campaign - in which he attempted to incite the owner of a business into litigation - fell flat when his claim the target had taken photos of a lot were proven to be Google Earth images fabricated by Derbyshire himself no less. The fiasco exposed here; <kdno2i$gho$1 @speranza.aioe.org> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135898786700 Sooo... the message? cave quid dicis, quando, et cui http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en search--------who is Seamus Derbyshire? -- replyTo: alt.usenet.kooks that video where Derbyshire expresses a desire for frisky goat; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be Paul's pik http://www.imagebam.com/image/44d69d232251662 Paul's Whine on Everything Derbyshire k00k http://off.st/7LE http://wayback.archive.org/web/20081013201552/http://66.39.71.195/Derbyshire/index.html Paul's Usenet BIO Derbyshire k00k http://off.st/PBN http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.kia-mennie/msg/8cc902d26eb5ee58?dmode=source Paul's Mandelbrot Derbyshire k00k http://off.st/thS http://wayback.archive.org/web/20121022211703/http://66.39.71.195/Derbyshire/mandlfaq.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web